I think it would be hard to be a Trinitarian and a Unitarian. As far as what
they believe, they would defy Paul's suggestion that a Christian *must*
"believe in Jesus of Nazareth." Some very liberal Christians care little
whether Jesus the man/son of God even existed, but instead follow the
example of the Christ figure. I won't get into it, but it's why I say the
analogy is flawed. Christianity is not simple and to try to explain it with
one simple definition is wrong. It might be a good analogy to say that
Libertarianism is like Christianity in that Libertarians push for more
liberty in one way or another just as Christians push for spirituality in
one way or another.



-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of terry12622000
Sent: Saturday, April 22, 2006 5:41 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [Libertarian] Re: Purity


  Some in the UU do belive in Christ as the son of God and part of the
  holy trinty but not all, of course even some stricter Christian
  Churchs don't believe in the trinty. I think the UU historically has
  support the teachings of Jesus and many members do today but I think
  many accept other religons as
  well.
        I guess my point is from a political ethics point of view and
  from a legal point of view the UU can call itself a  Christian Church
  if it wants to, from a religous pint of view or from A Christian
  Ethics point of view I can't say one way or the other, I'm no longer
  a Christian so I can't judge.--- In


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



ForumWebSiteAt  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian



SPONSORED LINKS
Libertarian English language Political parties
Online dictionary American politics


YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS




Reply via email to