Saying what you mean is always advised; implying what you will
later deny is not.
Since you say we disagree over what should be done now (Iraq
War), you strongly imply that you do not agree with a pull out.
Yet, you have yet to state your reasons. When are you planning to
do that?
-Mark
************
{American jurors have complete Constitutional authority to vote
"not guilty" based on nothing more than a disagreement with the
case, no matter the evidence - despite the judge's instructions.
There is absolutely no obligation to vote "guilty" to arrive at a
unanimous verdict. Get on a jury, stand your ground, and fulfill
its other main purpose: to counteract abusive government and
unjust lawsuits.
See www.fija.org
[Please adopt this as your own signature.] }
-----------
Well that pretty ignorant because I didn't say anyone had spit in
the faces of our troops when they came home (it was an analogy to
Vietnam and only meant as satire. My God). We simply have a
disagreement over what should be done now, not over the legality
of
the war, as all these posts imply.
--- In [email protected], "mark robert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> WG,
>
> I'll have a crack at your ignorance, ok? No one here that I
know,
> or nothing that I know as Libertarianism, has EVER done as you
> claim and imply:
> 1.) Blamed America for every conflict in the world;
> 2.) blamed America for not stepping in to stop conflicts;
> 3.) spit in the faces of our troops when they came home.
>
> -Mark
>
ForumWebSiteAt http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
- Visit your group "Libertarian" on the web.
- To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
