Ok I did the caps on purposed I was pissed for you saying I wanted
those good people to go hungry for that you owe me an apolgy and it
appears I may owe you one if all you are doing is calling for the
government to live up to its contract. If that is all you are wanting
abnd not wanting to tap every taxpayer or lay a guilt trip on them I
clearly owe you an
apology.
If any of the others say the government should not live up to
their contract then they are wrong although they would be right to
say government programs are a piss poor way to pay a
debt.
You hear it from several of the big wigs elitest in the Slavery
repreations movements calling for more nd more government programs
instead of giving the victims heirs the money directly, of course the
elitest want programs they are elitest snots who look down on their
people and several are looking to line their own pockets not help
black people.--- In [email protected], "John Stroebel"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hey pal, I am responding to remarks. Yours was ignored? Sorry.
Guilt trip?
> Why should I care one wit if you feel guilty? Your emotions do not
change
> this situation a bit.
>
> My replies were in response to strong suggestions that these people
have
> their aid cut off. They naively stated that the aid in itself was
the
> problem...as in, if your knee is shot out and that stops you from
walking,
> do not get it fixed, lop off the leg.
>
> Pay so much all America will feel the loss? Wow, that will be the
day, won't
> it? Pretty extreme. In fact, ridiculous. *Utterly* ridiculous. How
did we go
> from cut off their $400 a month (less than food stamps pays per
person in
> the rest of this country) to sacrifice enough to cause
>
>
> > *
> > >
> > > EVERY SINGLE AMERICAN TAXPAYER POOR, MODEST,
> > > > MIDDLE AND HIGH INCOMES THROUGH CORESIVE TAXES
> > >
> > > *
>
> ????
>
> GO back and read the first post, then come on back and rip me the
new
> one...but remember your caps lock in on first. Did I ever suggest
anything
> except to keep the contract they presently have and offer more
educational
> opportunities? If I did, show me.
>
> I have met a wall of 'Oh my, aid is bad bad bad and it should be
stopped'.
> When I informed that this would mean taking food from people who
can not
> even afford the simple necessities of life due to their placement
in the
> harshest place i have ever seen, I get the 'so what? it will be
better than
> AID!' speech. So keep the 'come off it' speech...it means zero to
me what
> you think. You want to be right? Go live there a year and see if
you can
> help out. It'll be an education for ya...THEN come on back and tell
me how
> wrong I am.
>
> YA know what troubles me about this theory? The 'fuck anyone who it
hurts'
> clause. You are talking human beings. Do any of YOU have trouble
putting
> food on the tables for YOUR 10 grandkids cause mommy and daddy drank
> themselves dead, went to jail or skipped out?
>
> On 6/27/06, terry12622000 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Ok man, come off of it, at least 3 people, one of them me has
said
> > the federal government has not lived up to it's to its agreement
but
> > you haved completely failed to give us credit for that by
responding
> > in a decent way ( well in fact you have totally ignored
> > that).
> > YES THE GOVERNMENT OWES THE INDIANS BIG TIME.DO YOU SEE WHAT I
> > AM WRITING NOW? SAYING THAT HOW CAN THE DEBT BE PAID AS MUCH AS
> > POSSIBLE WITHOUT TAPPING EVERY SINGLE AMERICAN TAXPAYER POOR,
MODEST,
> > MIDDLE AND HIGH INCOMES THROUGH CORESIVE TAXES THUS CREATING MORE
> > INJUSTICE? DO YOU WANT TO TALK ABOUT THAT ARE DO YOU JUST WANT TO
> > MAKE GUILT TRIP SPEECHES?--- In
[email protected]<Libertarian%40yahoogroups.com>,
> > "John
> >
> > Stroebel" <john.stroebel@> wrote:
> > >
> > > > but what are you wanting the average taxpayer or taxpayer of
> > > > modest or little means or even the wealthy taxpayer who earned
> > his or
> > > > her money by honest non rent seeking means to do about it and
why
> > do
> > > > you want them to pay up if that is what you are wanting,
> > > >
> > >
> > > What I *want?* You seem to miss the big picture here. It is what
> > they are *
> > > owed*. There is a legally binding contract between them and the
> > Federal
> > > Government in place, *period*. THese people have nothing, and
you
> > want to
> > > take the food from them, too. Sorry. Your finely sharpened
sence of
> > > 'practicality' and opinions on right and wrong do not touch the
> > fact that
> > > this is *a legal contract*.
> > >
> > > If you have a problem with that, petition your federal reps.
They
> > will get
> > > to screwing these people again real soon I am sure anyway.
> > >
> > >
> > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> *******************************************************************
> Are YOU Preparing For The November '06 Elections NOW???
>
> *******************************************************************
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Save-The-USA/
>
> It is time to do something about all this!
>
> *******************************************************************
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~-->
Yahoo! Groups gets a make over. See the new email design.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/XISQkA/lOaOAA/yQLSAA/KlSolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~->
ForumWebSiteAt http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
