On Wed, 6 Apr 2016, Paul T. Bauman wrote: > Thanks Derek!
Likewise! > All: Would there be interest in having this in libMesh proper? If it's general enough for you and if the MOOSE folks agree, then definitely. The only downside I can see is that I'd be tempted to add more APIs for ParallelMesh compatibility and use it to replace some inferior FIN-S code, and I have no time nor funding for either. --- Roy ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Libmesh-devel mailing list Libmesh-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-devel
