On Thursday 18 October 2001 16:16, you wrote: > Windows have a weak IrDA stack????
yes in terms of capabilities - weak. i didn't say it didn't work. for example, try changing the device name on a w2k box (/sys/proc/net/irda/devname on linux). you also can't delete from the ias. or get local values. actually, you can't even SEE the ias. there's no tools that i've seen to let you do that. > I can't believe it!!! It always work first time. In Linux work, but it is a > nightmare, becouse Linux is solid but also full of problem!!! i've never had a problem with it. of course, i'm writing my own application stack on top of irsock, not trying to point my phone at it. > > Windows 2000 have everything to do what u want with IrDA, lots of sotware, > hardware... :-))) > > Are u living in this world Andrew? windows has everything you might want to do except allow you to comply with international standards. in short... i live in a world where i NEED certain capabilities and performance enhancements that microsoft is not providing. fortunately, linux has (thanks guys!). good answer? Andrew Sutton [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Linux-IrDA mailing list - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.pasta.cs.UiT.No/mailman/listinfo/linux-irda
