I did not reply to the reply to my message because I believed it got
really off topic. I hope further discussions like these are done in
private or at the appropriate place. 

On Sat, 20 Oct 2001, Massimo Scabbia wrote:

> Hi Claudiu!
> 
> 
> >   I think is time to kill this thread. Now is slightly off-topic.
> >   Anyway, below my toughts :)
> 
> Why??? It's always good having a confrontation! And, well, it's time to say
> diehard Linux fans, with closed eyes, how the things work (or not work, in
> the case of Linux... :-)))))
> 
> >> Well, UNIX was a good command line OS, but now is time is over. We all
> need
> >> gui to simplify our work, and it's not really important if it's
> >> administrative work or office work, or better multimedia work.
> 
> >   Think about KDE & GNOME projects. In some respects M$ products must try
> >to take some lessons. I'll be glad to discuss after 1 year. Just think to
> >jump from KDE 1.x to 2.x series. It's huge. M$ can't afford to spent such
> >many number of developers to improve their GUI & friendlines.
> 
> For now KDE and Gnome are nothing more toys that crash most of the time...
> Especially versions 2 and 1.4. KDE 1 work but it's a baby gui... Nothing to
> do with the maturity of Explorer.
> 
> >> This is becouse I can't resist when someone ask him to port Linux IrDA
> >> stack under Windows becouse Windows stack is "weak" - like he say... I
> >> think also Brattli can laugh of it... He do some fun programming and
> >> Microsoft have 100 professional developers working on IrDA stack and
> >> someone say Windows IrDA stack is weak... LOL LOL LOL.
> 
> >    You're definitively wrong. Just think why many IrDA companies
> implemented
> >their stacks? Read why Miscrosoft abruptly dropped IrCOMM support in
> >W2000. They take things simply, and if someone don't like who cares?
> >Jean pointed some weeks ago and even I read this on M$ site.
> 
> Well, they dropped Ircomm becouse, like happen with me and with many others,
> is just a pain to make it work in many situations. Not the real solution.
> The IrDA bridge implemented on Win2000 work out of the box everytime with
> all the products. Ircomm is old technology, that's all.
> 
> >   Just go and use only Windows. Please forget about Linux and I'm
> personaly
> >sorry about your stress and lost time due to using Linux. It's time for you
> >to use only Windows.
> 
> Why? It's my choice. I like to learn things to improve my knowledge, and
> Linux is also FREE, so I like it becouse I not have to pay it! U have the
> typical attitude of many the Linux fans: u close your eyes becouse u love
> your bad toys... :-)))
> 
> >P.S. Please email-me privately if you want reply me.
> 
> Why??? It's always good to exchange opinions, this is a thing many Linux
> fans like yourself have to learn, it's more important that know using very
> well... :-)))
> 
> 
> Regards
> 
> Massimo
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-IrDA mailing list  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.pasta.cs.UiT.No/mailman/listinfo/linux-irda
> 

--
Roberto Jung Drebes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Porto Alegre, RS - Brasil
http://www.inf.ufrgs.br/~drebes/

_______________________________________________
Linux-IrDA mailing list  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pasta.cs.UiT.No/mailman/listinfo/linux-irda

Reply via email to