Hi, At Tue, 6 Feb 2001 17:14:36 +0100 , Karlsson Kent - keka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > (I can't argue the details about individual > characters. If you think there is an error, take it up with > the IRG.) Do you feel your opinion is authorized by the IRG? Then, please show me an evidence that IRG people think Japanese and Chinese shapes can be confused with no problem. Note that giving a common codepoint does not mean that the character can be displayed by a unified glyph. --- Tomohiro KUBOTA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://surfchem0.riken.go.jp/~kubota/ "Introduction to I18N" http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/intro-i18n/ - Linux-UTF8: i18n of Linux on all levels Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/lists/
- Re: CJK Unification Ienup Sung
- RE: CJK Unification Karlsson Kent - keka
- RE: CJK Unification Tomohiro KUBOTA
- RE: CJK Unification Karlsson Kent - keka
- RE: CJK Unification Tomohiro KUBOTA
- RE: CJK Unification Roozbeh Pournader
- Re: CJK Unification Werner LEMBERG
- RE: CJK Unification Karlsson Kent - keka
- RE: CJK Unification Tomohiro KUBOTA
- RE: CJK Unification Karlsson Kent - keka
- Re: CJK Unification Tomohiro KUBOTA
- Re: CJK Unification Pierpaolo BERNARDI
- Re: CJK Unification Tomohiro KUBOTA
- Re: CJK Unification David Starner
- IRG info (Re: CJK Unification) Harald Alvestrand
- RE: CJK Unification Tomohiro KUBOTA
- RE: CJK Unification Harald Alvestrand
- RE: CJK Unification Tomohiro KUBOTA
- RE: CJK Unification Karlsson Kent - keka
- RE: CJK Unification Karlsson Kent - keka
- Re: CJK Unification Markus Kuhn