Sounds like a job for the NSA - collateral compensation included :-(
Heiner -----Ursprüngliche Mitteilung----- Von: Joel M. Halpern <[email protected]> An: Ronald Bonica <[email protected]>; Dino Farinacci <[email protected]> Cc: LISP mailing list list <[email protected]> Verschickt: Mi, 4 Dez 2013 6:02 pm Betreff: Re: [lisp] WGLC draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-07 A partial answer that has been suggested is that the oeprator who deploys the PITR is an EID allocator rather than a conventional / existing ISP. Unfortunately, if LISp succeeds it is not clear that the compensation levels can match the increasing demand for traffic in the critical periods. Yours, Joel On 12/4/13 11:51 AM, Ronald Bonica wrote: > Dino, > > I am not understanding your response. Let me ask the question another way. > > Assume that an operator deploys a PITR. What policy can that operator enforce to ensure that it is compensated for all (or even most) of the traffic that it carries across that PITR? > > Ron > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Dino Farinacci [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2013 11:44 AM >> To: Ronald Bonica >> Cc: Luigi Iannone; Geoff Huston; Sander Steffann; LISP mailing list >> list >> Subject: Re: [lisp] WGLC draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-07 >> >>> Luigi, >>> >>> Is this really what is going to happen? >>> >>> If a PITR announces the entire /32 into the global Internet, it puts >> itself on the forwarding path for the entire /32, and incurs the cost >> associated with transporting traffic towards every site in that /32. >> This is supportable only if the PITR operator is somehow compensated >> for carrying all of that traffic. >> >> But maybe only from a few sources. But if the /32 needs to be divided >> based on region, then maybe /40s could be advertised. But to the point >> about "few sources", the more PITRs there are, the better the load is >> shared. >> >> And I envision PITRs will be deployed on on-path boxes anyways. Those >> boxes right now can route to the entire Internet, they are called PE >> boxes, are they not Ron? >> >>> Isn't it more likely that the PITR operator will advertise only >> slices of the /32, with each of those slices being assigned to either >> its customers (from whom it collects revenue) or the customers of other >> operators with whom it has made financial arrangements? >> >> No it won't be that way. EIDs are provider independent. If you do what >> we suggest, we make no forward progress. >> >> Dino >> >>> >>> Ron >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> lisp mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp >> >> > > > _______________________________________________ > lisp mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp > _______________________________________________ lisp mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
_______________________________________________ lisp mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
