At 3/16/99, 11:19 AM, John B. Reynolds wrote:
>
>Jay Fenello wrote:
>
>> For example, Iperdome may desire to join the following
>> constituencies, for the following reasons:
>>
>> ccTLD registries
>> Iperdome is the official registry for
>> the .per.nu domain, sub-delegated via
>> RFC-1591
>
>This would permit any holder of any subdomain under any ccTLD to be eligible
>for this constituency. This stretches its definition to the point of
>meaninglessness. The ccTLD constituency is properly limited to the TLD
>registries themselves.
Hi John,
If you were referring to .per.to, I would
agree with you. Iperdome simply registered
.per with .to, and we can use like any other
SLD registrant.
.per.nu, however, is different.
We have been delegated the SLD the same
way that .com.au, or atlanta.ga.us, have
been delegated. There was no charge for
this delegation, simply an agreement to
adhere to RFC-1591.
>> Non-commercial domain name holders
>> Iperdome's clients are almost exclusively
>> non-commercial domain name holders.
>
>But Iperdome itself is a commercial entity. On that basis, it is clearly
>ineligible.
Well, that's one interpretation.
Both of your comments, of course, highlight
the importance of "drawing lines." Thank
you for reinforcing my point.
