Michael and all,
Michael Sondow wrote:
> A.M.Rutkowski a �crit:
> >
> > Speaking of drawing lines, notice the major changes made
> > in the DNSO subject matter jurisdiction in the proposed
> > By-Laws changes.
> >
> > The old provisions provided for broad DNS related jurisdiction:
> > "...TLDs, including operation, assignment and management
> > of the domain name system and other related subjects."
> >
> > The new proposed provisions provide for very narrow
> > jurisdiction "...with respect to policy issues relating to top-level
> > domains."
> >
> > This sleight of hand would leave all other DNS related matters
> > exclusively to the ICANN Board.
>
> You're absolutely right. I stopped at this myself, and wondered if
> it wasn't an error. I still think it could be an error on the part
> of the staff who are drafting these things. But that's probably just
> wishful thinking. The truth is likely that the ICANN Board took heed
> of a posting that Jay made after the publication of the Registrar
> Accreditation Guidelines saying that they rendered the DNSO
> superfluous. And my own postings accusing the Board of usurping the
> DNSO's functions may have unwittingly added to their enlightenment.
>
> In this scenario, the inclusion of the DNSO within the ICANN
> structure as a non-incorporated body will make it doubly impossible
> for the DNSO to acquit its true functions. Joe Sims has really been
> working overtime. it seems. You've got to hand it to him, he's
> diabolically clever.
Excuse me? Simms clever? Well I am at a loss as to viewing
Mr Simms as clever.
Regards,
--
Jeffrey A. Williams
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Contact Number: 972-447-1894
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208
