Jay Fenello wrote:
>
> How would you word a qualification clause
> to only include "non-commercial" entities?
>
> Jay.
>
There are a number of ways it could be done. One possibility would be to
use the language in the Washington draft (I.B.3) as a starting point, with
appropriate additions (e.g. individuals) and deletions (e.g. governments).
Another would be to admit any individual or not for profit organization or
group. This suggestion has already generated the objection that some NFPs
(e.g. trade associations) may not be truly "non-commercial". One could also
define it negatively as any individual or group not eligible for the
"commercial and business entities" constituency. Specific wording requires
some consensus on exactly who should be included.
________________________________________________________
NetZero - We believe in a FREE Internet. Shouldn't you?
Get your FREE Internet Access and Email at
http://www.netzero.net/download.html
