At 3/16/99, 01:18 PM, John B. Reynolds wrote:
>
>Jay Fenello wrote:
>> >> Non-commercial domain name holders
>> >> Iperdome's clients are almost exclusively
>> >> non-commercial domain name holders.
>> >
>> >But Iperdome itself is a commercial entity. On that basis, it is clearly
>> >ineligible.
>>
>> Well, that's one interpretation.
>
>It's the only interpretation under which a non-commercial constituency is
>meaningful. If one were to open it to commercial entities on the basis that
>they have non-commercial entities and individuals as customers, it would
>quickly become dominated by ISPs and registries rather than those for whom
>the constituency is intended to provide representation.
Hi John,
I don't disagree with you, and I'm not
trying to be argumentative. My question
is "how do you draw the lines?"
How would you word a qualification clause
to only include "non-commercial" entities?
Jay.
