Jay Fenello wrote:
> >> Non-commercial domain name holders
> >> Iperdome's clients are almost exclusively
> >> non-commercial domain name holders.
> >
> >But Iperdome itself is a commercial entity. On that basis, it is clearly
> >ineligible.
>
>
> Well, that's one interpretation.
>
It's the only interpretation under which a non-commercial constituency is
meaningful. If one were to open it to commercial entities on the basis that
they have non-commercial entities and individuals as customers, it would
quickly become dominated by ISPs and registries rather than those for whom
the constituency is intended to provide representation.
> Both of your comments, of course, highlight
> the importance of "drawing lines." Thank
> you for reinforcing my point.
>
>
