Piers Cawley wrote: > Note that, in US phone numbers, the leading 1 is in fact the country > code. I think that in many cases, this may be coincidence -- that US-centric Americans put a long-distance 1 in front of their number, which just happens to be their country code. I'll admit that in some cases they may be aware that country codes are required for international calls, that putting a country code in your telephone number is a good thing if you do business widely, and that the country code for the NANP is 1. Cheers, Philip -- Philip Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> All opinions are my own, not my employer's. If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate.
- Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless... Chris Devers
- Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless... Chris Benson
- Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless... David Cantrell
- Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless... Roger Burton West
- Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Point... Dave Hodgkinson
- Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Point... David Cantrell
- Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Point... Matthew Byng-Maddick
- Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Point... Chris Benson
- Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless, Badly-W... David H. Adler
- Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless, Badly-Written Module... Philip Newton
- Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless, Badly-Written Module... Philip Newton
- Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless, Badly-Written Module... Philip Newton
- Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless, Badly-Written M... David Cantrell
- Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless, Badly-Writt... steve
- Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless, Badly-W... Greg McCarroll
- Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless, Badly-W... Marty Pauley
- Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless, Badly-Written M... Chris Benson
- Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless, Badly-Written Module... Philip Newton
- Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless, Badly-Written Module... Philip Newton
- Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless, Badly-Written Module... Philip Newton
- Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless, Badly-Written Module... Philip Newton