"Dimitrios Bogiatzoules, LPI Product Developer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Anyway, let us stop this never ending discussion.
Agreed, it's semantics and posturing at this point for many. Again, I will make the following summaries ... 1. LPIC-1 and "stop" As long as abbreviation and logo usage is allowed _perpetually_, that addresses the #1 complaint of other certification programs that "retire" certifications, including "uncertified" individuals who can no longer use the abbreviation and logo on their resume. 2. LPIC and practice "continuing education" For those who "continue" their "education" by either recertifying or, better yet, those who take and obtain higher or specialized titles, they are "better represented" by the ACTIVE/INACTIVE change. The fact that the change is made on a 5-year cycle is more in-line with "continuing education" requirements of professional certification/licensure. I think if LPI would declare that the original and continuing LPIC-1 title and logo usage is perpetual as it always has been, I think that would go a long way towards removing a lot of these arguments. -- Bryan J. Smith Professional, Technical Annoyance [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://thebs413.blogspot.com -------------------------------------------------- Fission Power: An Inconvenient Solution _______________________________________________ lpi-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-discuss
