On Friday 08 December 2006 12:07, Torsten Scheck wrote:
> Furthermore, I know at least of Anselm, Karl and Alan that they have
> been very active supporters of LPI ("ground crew") and I understand
> from their messages, that their trust into LPI is at stake--no matter
> how bravely Bryan defends LPI's actions (thank you Bryan, anyway).
> They feel betrayed, as they learned about the change only when the
> policy was officially effective, even though _they_ are the ones who
> deal with LPI's policies on a daily basis. There also seems to be the
> position among some LPI staff members that the change wasn't
> appropriately facilitated. Please be assured, that I take this very
> seriously.Hi Torsten, First I want to say thanks for everything you did mention in the rest of your email. There's a lot information there and it does make the picture a lot clearer. I'm also convinced that the majority of LPI's support base are smart people who will understand that needs and circumstance sometimes stay the same and sometimes change. I did want to comment directly on the paragraph I quoted above, to say that whereas I don't agree with how this change was communicated to us, that I still support LPI fully. These days I don't get to do as much LPI work as I would like, but hopefully this is a temporary state of affairs. To me, the LPI certs are still as important as they ever were and still a vital part of getting Linux "out there". alan _______________________________________________ lpi-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-discuss
