One answer is not enough (and early) exposure to Linux. Other answers
are best discussed off-list, lest I find myself having to invoke the
'misspoke defence' at a future date!
There are a lot of initiatives that can help change this (incubator
being one). Lets hope industry guys will get involved. It is far
cheaper/more efficient in the long run to start training your future
techies while they are still in school.
On Apr 16, 2008, at 09:00, Reinier Battenberg wrote:
Hi P.
Maybe we should discuss why MUK students are not using linux. After
all this
is the LUG (not the AUG ;-)
When we went to the presentation of the third year students last
year we saw a
lot of php/mysql applications. These just run and install much nicer
on
linux. That, in a normal world, would be a benifit for the students.
As MUK is preparing students for the real world, and in the real
world, php &
mysql applications run on linux & apache mostly, training students
in that
setup is also not a bad idea.
Well, i am preaching for my own church (and the AUG guys) again.
Is there anything we can do to make that clear to MUK tutors &
students?
rgds,
reinier
On Wednesday 16 April 2008 06:24:52 P. A. Bagyenda wrote:
Indeed it would be sad.
PC market share made Intel great. It lowered prices, and powered the
Mhz war. It is doubtful that their chips were ever better,
architecture-wise or in terms of raw speed. Even today. take a look
at
the Power 6 chip that IBM is touting recently. Or for that matter
Sun's UltraSPARC 'Niagara' range. Can't Touch This, as MC Hammer
would
say!
The other day I had to explain to a bewildered second year (MUK)
class why Java and its machine-independence was such a big deal way
back then. They have grown up in a world where Computer = Intel =
Windows, and can't understand all the fuss. (Sadly, Linux is not much
in the running there, for reasons too long to recount.)
P.
On Apr 15, 2008, at 21:17, Niles Collins wrote:
Yeah, intel chips are better than Power PC chips, but i have very
little experience with Power PC chips. I always felt that if one
company dominated the PC chip market then that would stop
innovation. AMD makes great chips and that is all i buy but they are
still derivatives of the i386 architecture which i believe is an
intel standard. Intel seems to be locking up the micro chip market.
A lot of phone are going to start using their Atom processor now.
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 12:33 PM, Mark Tinka
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tuesday 15 April 2008, Niles Collins wrote:
Apple should have
stayed with IBM and Power PC chips if they wanted to stop
this from happening.
Not a strong-enough case to ignore more superior
microprocessors (or so I think). You see even Cisco are
departing from Motorola Freescale and IBM's PPC in favour
of Intel-driven control planes.
Copy-catting is a fact of life - Apple should figure out how
to deal with it.
Mark.
_______________________________________________
LUG mailing list
[email protected]
http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/lug
%LUG is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/
The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them
(including attachments if any). The List's Host is not responsible
for them in any way.
---------------------------------------
--
rgds,
Reinier Battenberg
Director
Mountbatten Ltd.
+256 782 801 749
www.mountbatten.net
_______________________________________________
LUG mailing list
[email protected]
http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/lug
%LUG is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/
The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them
(including attachments if any). The List's Host is not responsible
for them in any way.
---------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
LUG mailing list
[email protected]
http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/lug
%LUG is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/
The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them (including
attachments if any). The List's Host is not responsible for them in any way.
---------------------------------------
