Martyn,
       I agree with you that there is no evidence for for rolled chords
   before the 17th century. I'm not sure we can translate this absence
   into any pronouncements about performance practice.
       Interesting that the subject of rolled chords on piano has been
   brought into this. There are in fact many aspects of 19th century
   performance that are in abundance in late19th/early 20th cent.
   recordings but never discussed in contemporary treatises. One finds,
   for example, that inegalite was so widespread as to be nearly
   ubiquitous, even though it is not often mentioned. I haven't heard a
   single recording or piano roll that features the type of rubato in
   which the left hand truly remains in strict tempo while the right hand
   plays freely around the beat, even though this is often discussed in
   the treatises. Clearly, their ideas regarding "strict tempo" was highly
   subjective and not obliged to use the type of metronomic exactitude we
   would expect today. Performing this repertoire in strict adherence to
   contemporary writings would lead to something quite different than the
   audio recorded record reveals.
   Chris

   Christopher Wilke
   Lutenist, Guitarist and Composer
   www.christopherwilke.com
   ----- Original Message -----
   From: Martyn Hodgson <[email protected]>
   To: Christopher Wilke <[email protected]>
   Cc: lute <[email protected]>
   Sent: Saturday, November 17, 2012 3:36 AM
   Subject: [LUTE] Re: Rolled chords
     Dear Chris,
     I'm not sure I agree with you when you write "This lack of
   specificity
     implies that the signs are merely an indication for a pre-existing
   and
     well known practice.".  It might equally imply that before this time
     the practice of 'rolled' chords was unusual.
     But please don't misunderstand my position: I'm not categorically
     saying that 'rolled' chords were never played pre-17th century;
   merely
     that there's no historical evidence for the practice (unlike the
     position for such chords in 19th/early 20th century piano
   performance).
     regards,
     Martyn
     --- On Fri, 16/11/12, Christopher Wilke <[1][email protected]>
   wrote:
       From: Christopher Wilke <[2][email protected]>
       Subject: Re: [LUTE] Re: Rolled chords
       To: "Martyn Hodgson" <[3][email protected]>, "Gary R. Boye"
       <[4][email protected]>
       Cc: "WALSH STUART" <[5][email protected]>, "lute"
       <[6][email protected]>
       Date: Friday, 16 November, 2012, 18:47
     Martyn,
     It is very telling that when signs for arpeggiation - i.e. separee
     slashes, the % sign in Kapsberger and others' theorbo music - are
     introduced, they include no information regarding speed or rhythm.
   This
     lack of specificity implies that the signs are merely an indication
   for
     a pre-existing and well known practice. How long the practice was in
     existence and in what precise guise it was used is, as I said before,
     inconclusive. Few would argue today that because indications for
     articulation or dynamics are rare in much early written music, one
     should refrain from playing with either.  (I said, "few would
     argue...". Some still do.)
     Perrine's suggestions for rhythmicizing separee ciphers is the
     exception that proves the rule. My suspicion is that these may not be
   a
     literal record of contemporary lutenists' performance practice.
   Rather,
     he was probably attempting to show keyboard players how to
   approximate
     an idiomatic lute effect via the resources of a different medium.
   There
     is a parallel in the piano works of 19th century Spanish composers
   like
     Albeniz and Granados, who often evoked guitar rasgueados with fast
     arpeggiated figures. These works in transcription have become
   mainstays
     of modern guitar repertoire and this brings up another manifestation
   of
     the "composer's intentions" issue. Should guitarists slavishly
     reproduce as many of the written notes of the piano score as exactly
   as
     possible, or can "strummy" gestures be replaced with bona fide
     rasgueados? What would the composer want? Even in these comparatively
     recent works, we really don't have an answer.
     Chris
     Christopher Wilke
     Lutenist, Guitarist and Composer
     www.christopherwilke.com
     ----- Original Message -----
     From: Martyn Hodgson <[7][email protected]>
     To: Gary R. Boye [1][8][email protected]
       Maybe they were - it's just strange that other methods are reported
     on
       the lute but this one not....
       regards
       Martyn
       --- On Fri, 16/11/12, Gary R. Boye <[2][9][email protected]>
   wrote:
         From: Gary R. Boye <[3][10][email protected]>
         Subject: Re: [LUTE] Rolled chords
         To: "Christopher Wilke" <[4][11][email protected]>
         Cc: "Martyn Hodgson" <[5][12][email protected]>, "WALSH
   STUART"
         <[6][13][email protected]>, "lute"
   <[7][14][email protected]>
         Date: Friday, 16 November, 2012, 15:38
       Chris,
       Interesting that you should bring up rolled chords; there was much
       discussion on another list several months ago about this YouTube
     video:
       Louis Podesta's "Your Piano Teacher Taught You Wrong"
       [1][8][15]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2VPgg3armCI
       Gary
       Dr. Gary R. Boye
       Professor and Music Librarian
       Appalachian State University
           >    ----- Original Message -----
     Dear Chris,
     Perhaps 'rolled' chords were common -  as you say, there's no early
     evidence for them which may mean they were not used or if used then
   not
     reported.  But we do know that other ways of playing chords were
     reported so why not this one if it were practised?
     And I see no conflict between being 'informed' and, even, practising
     historical techniques with enhancing the music: the two are not
     mutually exclusive. Indeed some might suggest that employing
   historical
     technique serves the music and the composers' intentions best and so
     further enhances the music.
     Martyn
     --- On Fri, 16/11/12, Christopher Wilke <[16][email protected]>
   wrote:
       From: Christopher Wilke <[17][email protected]>
       Subject: Re: [LUTE] Re: Re/deconstructing Dowland; - and 'rolled'
       chords
       To: "Martyn Hodgson" <[18][email protected]>, "WALSH
   STUART"
       <[19][email protected]>
       Cc: "lute" <[20][email protected]>
       Date: Friday, 16 November, 2012, 14:28
     Martyn,
           The use of rolled chords, like so many things in early music
     performance, has to be assigned to the "inconclusive" category. Lack
   of
     evidence does not mean lack of practice. For example, the subject is
     rarely mentioned in modern classical guitar methods even though it is
   a
     ubiquitous. Rolling may just have been one of those things that was
     done without comment.
         Who knows? As always, our primary concern should not be with how
     "informed" we are, but whether or not what we do enhances the music.
     Chris
     Christopher Wilke
     Lutenist, Guitarist and Composer
     www.christopherwilke.com
     ----- Original Message -----
     Re [LUTE] Re: Re/deconstructing Dowland; - and 'rolled' chords
     Friday, 16 November, 2012 13:58
     From: "Martyn Hodgson" [9][21][email protected]
     To: "WALSH STUART" <[22][email protected]>
     Cc: "lute" <[23][email protected]>
         Dear Stuart,
         I agree with you that we need to be wary in our (modern)
   assessments
     of  many of these works.
         For example, some of these lute 'solos', both by Dowland and
   other
     lute  playing composers, may be lute parts to a consort or a duet and
     can seem strangely incomplete whilst still fooling modern editors (eg
         Holborne's 'The Cradle' in Dd.2.11.  - noted on page 8 of the
   recent
         Lute Society edition),  so we need to be careful before
   discarding
     them
         onto the scrap heap of musical spam.  I'm also uneasy of imposing
     our
         ideas of what was the 'right' harmonic practice at the time:
   'crude'
         harmonies might be as much a stylistic trait as a sign of
     compositional
         rudeness.
         Regarding 'rolled' chords also raised in this thread, these seem
   to
     be
         (too?) ubiquitous in this repertoire nowadays and early sources
   (ie
         pre-17th century) don't generally describe the technique. Only
   when
     we
         get to the French 17th century lute with separe signs and the
   like
     is
         the expectation for such fully upwards arpeggiated chords clear.
     Even
         Barley, a perhaps unfairly maligned source, indicates a technique
     for
         playing full 6 note chords or open 5 note chords not too far
   removed
         from that described by later sources (including Mace and
   Burwell's
         teacher as well as by continental instructions), in which the
   first
         finger rakes upwards (ie towards the bass) to cover some of the
     courses whilst the second and third fingers strike the others. I
   would
     suggest this was more common than we often suppose nowadays and
   perhaps
     led onto the later practice of playing the bass and simultaneously
     raking up with the first finger - with the possible added
     sophistication of  restriking the highest course or two with the
   second
     finger - almost the opposite of a modern 'rolled' chord.
         Martyn
     --
   References
     1. mailto:[24][email protected]
     2.
   [25]http://us.mc817.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]
     3.
   [26]http://us.mc817.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]
     4.
   [27]http://us.mc817.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]
     5.
   [28]http://us.mc817.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]
   .uk
     6.
   [29]http://us.mc817.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]
     7.
   [30]http://us.mc817.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]
     8. [31]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2VPgg3armCI
     9.
   [32]http://us.mc817.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]
   .uk
   To get on or off this list see list information at
   [33]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

   --

References

   1. mailto:[email protected]
   2. mailto:[email protected]
   3. mailto:[email protected]
   4. mailto:[email protected]
   5. mailto:[email protected]
   6. mailto:[email protected]
   7. mailto:[email protected]
   8. mailto:[email protected]
   9. mailto:[email protected]
  10. mailto:[email protected]
  11. mailto:[email protected]
  12. mailto:[email protected]
  13. mailto:[email protected]
  14. mailto:[email protected]
  15. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2VPgg3armCI
  16. mailto:[email protected]
  17. mailto:[email protected]
  18. mailto:[email protected]
  19. mailto:[email protected]
  20. mailto:[email protected]
  21. mailto:[email protected]
  22. mailto:[email protected]
  23. mailto:[email protected]
  24. mailto:[email protected]
  25. http://us.mc817.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]
  26. http://us.mc817.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]
  27. http://us.mc817.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]
  28. http://us.mc817.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]
  29. http://us.mc817.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]
  30. http://us.mc817.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]
  31. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2VPgg3armCI
  32. http://us.mc817.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]
  33. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

Reply via email to