It wouldn't have been a priority for me, either. I just don't think it's the end of the world now that it's here. Donna
-----Original Message----- From: Scott Howell <s.how...@verizon.net> Sent: Sunday, August 30, 2009 5:41 AM To: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: 3 features that hmm? Hmmm, maybe I'm having issues in articulation. My point is and has been that I don't disagree the feature does more harm then good, because yes, it does hold one back from truly getting the concept of editing from the perspective of the majority; if that makes sense. Asking Apple to remove it at this point makes little sense is what I'm saying. I recall the debate and all the crap surrounding the issue of editing one way vs. the other. Personally I would not have wasted the code, but at the same time if it really proves to be beneficial then great. I'd hate to think someone would choose not to switch based on the issue of editing and so, since the feature is here, then great. Gee, I think this thread has generated nearly as much noise as the entire editing thread. Hey I see her point and I'm not disagreeing, just saying since it's here I hope someone will benefit if that is what is holding them up and yeah, this sure generated a lot of issues when it came up as a topic. Hell, I had trouble understanding this initially and now when I do use windows-based screen reader, I have to work hard at remembering the old way of editing. :) --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MacVisionaries" group. To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
