2010/3/7 Ian Romanick <i...@freedesktop.org>:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Török Edwin wrote:
>
>> I've run the piglit tests using tests/r500.tests, with glean in quick mode.
>>
>> With patch: 620/686 pass
>> Without patch: 614/679 pass (I opened a bugreport about these failures
>> here: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26933)
>>
>> The pbo tests results are:
>> glean/pbo: fail
>> general/pbo-teximage-tiling: pass
>> general/pbo-read-argb8888: pass
>> general/pbo-teximage-tiling-2: pass
>> general/pbo-drawpixels: pass
>> general/pbo-readpixels-small: pass
>> general/object_purgeable-api-pbo: skip
>> general/pbo-teximage: pass
>> fbo/fbo-pbo-readpixels-small: pass
>
> Okay.  I'm convinced.  I'll leave it up to the r600 maintainers to make
> the final call.  However, they really need to do it before RC1 (March 12th).
>

Ok, I've gone ahead and enabled the extension in the 7.8 branch.

Alex

>> The glean/fbo fail looks like some FP tolerance being too strict (1.0 vs
>> 1.00000). Is there a way to accept 1.00000 for 1.0 in the piglit tests?
>>
>> pbo test: Test OpenGL Extension GL_ARB_pixel_buffer_object
>>
>> FAILURE: glGetPolygonStipple failed (at tpbo.cpp:1028)
>> (1, 0) = [1.000000, 1.000000, 1.000000], should be [1.0, 1.0, 1.0]
>> pbo:  NOTE perf[0] = 372.891 MB/s, which is in normal mode
>> pbo:  NOTE perf[1] = 261.088 MB/s, which is using PBO
>> pbo:  FAIL rgba8, db, z24, s8, win+pmap, id 33
>>       9 tests passed, 1 tests failed.
>
> That's pretty weird.  I was pretty sure that glean checked for equality
> by making sure the difference was below some threshold.  As far as I can
> tell, fabs(1.000000 - 1.0) should be below any reasonable threshold.
> There's clearly something else going wrong.
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAkuUJLYACgkQX1gOwKyEAw/MPQCfZ8b/sSBRR8yN8z9u6tQrlY7J
> +4sAnRKvgpboQ8D3ObcNwW5lEUKudPPv
> =5D6f
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Download Intel&#174; Parallel Studio Eval
> Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
> proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
> See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
> _______________________________________________
> Mesa3d-dev mailing list
> Mesa3d-dev@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mesa3d-dev
>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel&#174; Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
Mesa3d-dev mailing list
Mesa3d-dev@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mesa3d-dev

Reply via email to