Ah! Let the children pay for their own health insurance!
Dan -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Scott MacLean Sent: Saturday, September 26, 2009 6:56 PM To: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: NMC - Healthcare Crisis Debate / Gay Marriage There should be no benefit for ANY marriage or domestic partnership. The government doesn't need to be in the business of subsidizing familys with or without reproductive capacity. Subsidize the children directly. Scott ----- Original Message ----- From: [email protected] To: [email protected] Sent: Saturday, September 26, 2009 6:07:33 AM GMT -08:00 US/Canada Pacific Subject: Re: NMC - Healthcare Crisis Debate / Gay Marriage In a message dated 9/25/2009 6:16:29 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, [email protected] writes: If my sister and I want to move into a house together, adopt disadvantaged kids, who nobody else wants and are being bounced from foster home to foster home, and raise them, why shouldn't we be able to get all of the tax advantages, health care advantages, etc, as a "married" couple that does the same thing, but makes their own kids? Dan In my opinion you should be entitled to the same treatment as a married couple. It is Religious Nonsense that the STATE has incorporated into law that decides who may claim that status, and our laws are not supposed to be made or continued based on religious grounds. A secondary Federal status that you WOULD qualify for is Head of Household. _______________________________________________ Miatapower mailing list [email protected] http://list.miatapower.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/miatapower _______________________________________________ Miatapower mailing list [email protected] http://list.miatapower.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/miatapower _______________________________________________ Miatapower mailing list [email protected] http://list.miatapower.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/miatapower
