As to the “Nuh-uh” school, we could bash each other forever Chris.

I anxiously await your argument in favor of hypocrisy surgery.


On Dec 1, 10:03 am, Chris Jenkins <[email protected]> wrote:
> Oh, Orn, your telepathic powers are remarkable! Or is this actually a pot
> calling a kettle black? I do believe it is. You presume to do that which you
> accuse me of. Classic.
>
> Of course, here one finds some of the worst type of bifurcation
>
> > exemplifying the hypocrisy of one who lauds the wonders of not using
> > fallacies.
>
> Your statement does not make it so. I am not hypocritical in my approach,
> and your response is an example of the bifurcation you accuse me of.
>
>
>
> > Further, such argument by dismissal does not address that which
> > Chomsky points out and appears to be more of a veiled argument to the
> > man and/or selective observation. Such non sequitur criticism is easy
> > to expose for what it is.
>
> The facts remain the facts. I have not approached from an ad hominem
> perspective, but rather from a practice what you preach perspective. It
> seems to me from a logical standpoint that if his opinions regarding this
> system were as strong as they purport to be, he would not be engaging so
> actively within this system, including somewhat ethically questionable uses
> of the system.
>
>
>
> > On the personal side, I can only guess that seeing one’s emperor
> > without cloths can drive one to madness.
>
> More projection! I have no emperor. I have only played Devil's Advocate, and
> have not made a positive stand towards any viewpoint. In fact, I've espoused
> some M.O.R. ideologies which are in direct conflict to those you falsely
> baselessly assume to be my emperor. Is your use of that which you accuse me
> of ironic? Because if it's sincere, it's truly sad.
>
>
>
> > “…Chomsky strikes me as one of those guys you see all too often in the
> > GOP: A
> > flaming right winger who rants on the evils of homosexuality, making
> > every
> > move to block legislation guaranteeing equality for gays, and then
> > secretly
> > getting sucked off by a towel boy at the country club. It's all
> > bullshit.” – Chris
>
> > Numerous problems with the analogy Christ as I’m sure you know.
> > However, your “It’s all bullshit.”, comment is what is most telling to
> > me. I can only guess that your primary argument is based on a dislike
> > of apparent hypocrisy. Correct?
>
> No problems whatsoever with my analogy, and another example of your
> "argument by dismissal", which unlike mine, didn't actually include any
> salient points. You seem to be satisfied with a "Nuh-uh, that's not the way
> it is!" Poor form, old chap. If you think there are problems with my
> analogy, why don't you spell them out?
>
> You should be clearly able to understand that my argument is SPECIFICALLY
> against hypocrisy, as I've said that numerous times.
>
> > An argument by you and perhaps even Neil for removing hypocrisy from
> > the human race and/or even selective people would be of great
> > interest.
>
> I'm all for that.
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Dec 1, 7:00 am, Chris Jenkins <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > This is what has always irked me about Noam. If the system is as horrible
> > as
> > > he decries, then his aggressive use of it is either:
>
> > > A. blatant hypocrisy which undermines his rantings on the topic.
> > > B. a conscious decision to profit from a system he believes to be evil,
> > thus
> > > calling into question his personal morals and ethics.
> > > C. a combination of the two.
>
> > > Chomsky strikes me as one of those guys you see all too often in the GOP:
> > A
> > > flaming right winger who rants on the evils of homosexuality, making
> > every
> > > move to block legislation guaranteeing equality for gays, and then
> > secretly
> > > getting sucked off by a towel boy at the country club. It's all bullshit.
>
> > > On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 9:46 AM, Lee <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > Heh quite something that huh.
>
> > > > Still I can't help but think that he is only taking advantage of the
> > > > schemes open to one of his wealth in order to keep it, as the rest of
> > > > his ilke do I guess.  That it is incredibly hard to live a life bound
> > > > by ones morality when all others in a similar situation to you take
> > > > advantage of the system, and that if fair laws were intruduced and
> > > > things like these tax havens simply did not exist so that a rich man
> > > > paid his tax burden like the rest of us, then he would be more able to
> > > > live live in an un-hypocritical way.
>
> > > > Although it is a good point well made, bloody hypocrit!  Heh then
> > > > again, point me out just one person who truely practices what they
> > > > preach 100% of the time.
>
> > > > On 1 Dec, 13:17, Chris Jenkins <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > Noam certainly knows something about wealth and capitalism...
>
> > > > >http://www.hoover.org/publications/digest/2912626.html
>
> > > > > On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 3:39 AM, ornamentalmind <
> > [email protected]
> > > > >wrote:
>
> > > > > > An interview with Noam that includes a deeper analysis of wealth,
> > > > > > distribution and government than that found on corporate news:
>
> > > > > >http://anarchismtoday.org/News/article/sid=74.html
>
> > > > > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > > > > “I’m concerned that students not become passive acceptors of the
> > > > > > official doctrine that’s handed down to them from the White House,
> > the
> > > > > > media, textbooks, teachers and preachers” – Howard Zinn
>
> > > > > > On Nov 30, 7:47 pm, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > > > Brilliant Don!   I concur, ditto.
>
> > > > > > > On Nov 30, 3:48 pm, Don Johnson <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > More wealth redistribution ideologuery.  If the man knew about
> > > > feeding
> > > > > > > > the needy he wouldn't spout such non-sense.  Meals on Wheels
> > has
> > > > > > > > nothing to do with Social Security.  Community service, by
> > > > definition,
> > > > > > > > is local and supported by local businesses and private donors.
> >  SS
> > > > is
> > > > > > > > nothing but an enormous Ponzi scheme that soon will fail unless
> > > > > > > > massive amounts of money are pumped into it.  It is consumed by
> > > > fraud
> > > > > > > > and waste.  This is what happens to enormous federal entities.
> > > > > > > > Proponents of single payer HC should sit up and take notice.
>
> > > > > > > > Community service isn't subversive it is being phased out by
> > the
> > > > > > > > federal government.  Our earnings are increasingly being
> > > > confiscated
> > > > > > > > and we have less to help our local citizens out.  The money is
> > > > being
> > > > > > > > used to fund politicians pet projects and as bribes to get new
> > > > > > > > colossal spending bills passed.  See the New Louisiana
> > Purchase.
> > > >  Mr.
> > > > > > > > Chomsky has it backwards and I think he probably knows it.
>
> > > > > > > > -Don
>
> > > > > > > > n Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 10:20 AM, ornamentalmind
>
> > > > > > > > <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > Other than the obvious irony, how would you criticize this
> > recent
> > > > > > > > > quote by Noam?
>
> > > > > > > > > "Social Security is based on an extremely dangerous
> > principle:
> > > > that
> > > > > > > > > you should care whether the disabled widow across town has
> > food
> > > > to
> > > > > > > > > eat. The Social Security "reformers" would rather have you
> > > > > > concentrate
> > > > > > > > > on maximizing your own consumption of goods and subordinating
> > > > > > yourself
> > > > > > > > > to power. That's life. Caring for other people, and taking
> > > > community
> > > > > > > > > responsibility for things like health and retirement — that's
> > > > just
> > > > > > > > > deeply subversive." – Noam Chomsky
>
> > > > > > > > >http://www.zcommunications.org/zquotes/2600
>
> > > > > > > > > --
>
> > > > > > > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the
> > > > Google
> > > > > > Groups ""Minds Eye"" group.
> > > > > > > > > To post to this group, send email to
> > [email protected].
> > > > > > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > > > > > [email protected]<minds-eye%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups­.com>
> > <minds-eye%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups­.com>
> > > > <minds-eye%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups­.com>
> > > > > > .
> > > > > > > > > For more options, visit this group athttp://
> > > > > > groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > > > > > --
>
> > > > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> > > > Groups
> > > > > > ""Minds Eye"" group.
> > > > > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> > > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > > > > > [email protected]<minds-eye%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups­.com>
> > <minds-eye%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups­.com>
> > > > <minds-eye%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups­.com>
> > > > > > .
> > > > > > For more options, visit this group at
> > > > > >http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en.-Hidequoted text -
>
> > > > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > > > --
>
> > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> > Groups
> > > > ""Minds Eye"" group.
> > > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > > > [email protected]<minds-eye%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups­.com>
> > <minds-eye%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups­.com>
> > > > .
> > > > For more options, visit this group at
> > > >http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en.-Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > --
>
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > ""Minds Eye"" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > [email protected]<minds-eye%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups­.com>
> > .
> > For more options, visit this group at
> >http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

--

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
""Minds Eye"" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en.


Reply via email to