It is instructional to note the snarling, snorting and chewing at the
red meat when a simple copy/paste is presented.

On Dec 3, 8:10 am, Chris Jenkins <[email protected]> wrote:
> More of Orn's favorite...bifurcation!
>
> The reality is, .01% may be truly active terrorists (and I sincerely doubt
> the number is that low...), but 60% live in countries where Islamic
> Theocratic Rule mandates beatings and executions for renouncing your faith,
> or converting to another faith, and horrifying "punishments" for women to
> have the audacity to go out alone, drive, be educated, choose whom to share
> their body or lives with, or Allah Forbid, be raped. Overwhelmingly, the men
> of those countries support said policies, and Sharia law.
>
> Interesting to me that you think of the liberties in the west, which include
> equality between genders, free speech, freedom of religion, freedom of the
> press, etc, as:
> "Western society demand(ing) its right to be
> intoxicated and irascible to the point of outright destructive
> behaviour afterwards and the duty to oppress one another through usury
> and other ways (in the name of 'Survival of the Fittest', a euphemism
> for maintaining that animal instincts are the way forward!!) and
> Muslims don't understand why Western, supposedly civilised people,
> demand the right to act like idiots, screw up the environment and take
> as much as is possible from those who have the least.  Muslims don't
> view that as civilised behaviour."
>
> Hmmm...so, it's not the CORE differences in our liberty based society that
> offends them, it's the excesses of the minority. Interesting. I personally
> don't view burying 12 year old girls to their necks and stoning them to
> death for the crime of being raped as civilized, but hey, perhaps we just
> have a different perspective. I'm not sure why it is you think Muslims will
> be left with the moral high ground...perhaps you find Sharia law to be an
> attractive rule set and world view to live under? Surprising to me that
> someone in such a modern environment would have such a barbaric
> perspective.
>
> It's one thing to note that the tenets of a religion do not match the
> actions of the followers; hell, that's the problem with religions the world
> over. It is, however, very much a case of sticking your head in the sand to
> deny that the general actions of a vast majority of a religion's followers
> (who live in Sharia based societies), reflect on that religion as a whole.
> Would you be so passionately apologetic of Christianity? I'm guessing not,
> but feel free to correct me.
>
> Compare human rights in any Muslim controlled country to any of the Western
> secular controlled countries. Compare the general standard of living of the
> masses. Compare the number of atrocities perpetuated in the name of religion
> between the two. Moral high ground? Ludicrous.
>
> The twelve apostles of Christ had some interesting ideas. The religion since
> then has been a blood thirsty, backwards, barbaric organization responsible
> for the deaths of millions. Only in the last century has Christianity made
> ANY forward movement in social evolution. Islam is still 300 years behind
> that.
>
> P.S. Here's some good reading about the history of Islamic Militancy. It
> goes back FAR further than you apparently seem to think.
>
> http://islam-watch.org/MA_Khan/IncessantTerrorism.htm
>
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 7:58 AM, Pat <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > On 3 Dec, 01:53, Don Johnson <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > Interesting development.  Perhaps, despite tremendous efforts from the
> > > PC crowd, some folks are beginning to see the connection between
> > > Islamic militant terrorism and your friendly neighborhood mosque.  In
> > > the chatter in the control room(water cooler) I heard something about
> > > some politician offering to allow it when Saudi Arabia allows
> > > Christian churches to be built there.  No going, apparently.
>
> > > Another problem is the Islamic schools popping up all over western
> > > culture.  All funded by rich Arabs for the most part.  A study done on
> > > the text books supplied these kids was a little alarming.  Little
> > > Osamas are being indoctrinated on our home soil.  Unless laws are
> > > changed this problem will increase.  I'm still flabbergasted we didn't
> > > start profiling at the airports after 9/11.  I'm shocked folks are
> > > still whining about the Patriot Act.
>
> > It could just be a numbers game.  Given a Muslim population of 1.6
> > Billion (1,600,000,000), if 0.01% of them are militant terrorists
> > (i.e., 99.99% good people), then there are 16,000 problems out there.
> > And 16 thousand people can, if organised, cause a great deal of
> > trouble.  However, that shouldn't paint the other 99.99% of good
> > people with the paintbrush called 'Terrorist Potential'.  We are ALL
> > potential terrorists, given the right impetus, so the profiling should
> > be for ALL.
>
> > > If we could get these other countries to open their borders and allow
> > > freedom of religion I'd feel a lot better about allowing them to build
> > > more here.  I am not, by the way, in favor of interment camps or
> > > shutting down the mosques already here that have proven themselves
> > > peaceful and are a compliment to the community.  I have to say that or
> > > some of you would be jumping down my throat accusing me of genocide.
>
> > > -Don
>
> > > On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 4:28 PM, fran the man <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > On 2 Dez., 17:58, Ian Pollard <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > >> Fantastic news and, despite what you say, very progressive! :)
>
> > > > Er, Ian, I don't believe I personally put forward any opinion as to
> > > > the progressive, or otherwise nature of the decision of the Swiss
> > > > people in my original post. I simply formulated some of the questions
> > > > which are being publicly discussed in Europe following the referendum.
>
> > > > Formally, the Swiss simply decided to forbid the building of minarets
> > > > in their country. No more, no less. Symbolically, of course, writing
> > > > this prohibition into Swiss law means much more - indeed, many
> > > > different things to different people. Personally, I would incline to
> > > > the view that what can and cannot be built is more a matter for local
> > > > authorities and their procedures for granting planning permission. A
> > > > well-designed mosque with minaret may well improve certain urban
> > > > landscapes from an architectural/aesthetic perspective, just as many
> > > > badly designed and situated Christian churches are simply ugly and
> > > > just don't fit in where they are.
>
> > > > The much deeper question of Islam and the relationship between it, as
> > > > a religious-cultural-political Weltanschauung and western societies
> > > > and the values they (we) see as being basic to their (our) self-
> > > > understanding is complex and multi-facetted. My hope is that this
> > > > thread may take up some of these issues.
>
> > > > Francis
>
> > > > --
>
> > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> > Groups ""Minds Eye"" group.
> > > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > [email protected]<minds-eye%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups­.com>
> > .
> > > > For more options, visit this group athttp://
> > groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > --
>
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > ""Minds Eye"" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > [email protected]<minds-eye%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups­.com>
> > .
> > For more options, visit this group at
> >http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

--

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
""Minds Eye"" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/minds-eye?hl=en.


Reply via email to