hmmmm let me see...

On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 1:26 AM, gruff <[email protected]> wrote:

> test
>
>
you passed
Allan


> On Jun 18, 3:53 pm, archytas <[email protected]> wrote:
> > There's a lot of the economy that seems to need to be pretty bland and
> > distributed unevenly but needed everywhere, and some that seems to be
> > a lot cleverer that is pretty secretive and only allowed to a few.  We
> > seem to have little clue about how much work anyone should have to do
> > and to live in fear of both having to do it and not having any to do.
> > All remarkably unhealthy.  The rest is a con of some sort.
> >
> > On 18 June, 19:39, iam deheretic <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > Well I am not so sure about that ..  it was called to my attention of
> the
> > > Jews out in the desert and the Golden calf.. it seemed God or Moses had
> a
> > > little problem with that issue..  and it seems to me that capitalism
> leads
> > > to the dance and worship  of the golden calf.
> > > Allan
> >
> > > On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 2:58 PM, pol.science kid <[email protected]
> >wrote:
> >
> > > > Oh yeah.. they say the capitalist way is the sure way to heaven..and
> thats
> > > > the path they preach to the comparatively new baby countries that are
> > > > undecided on their path...
> >
> > > > On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 5:36 PM, gabbydott <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> > > >> Founded in capitalism?  Did God write up the founding theory for
> > > >> economics too? Is that what they teach you at school?
> >
> > > >> On 17 Jun., 02:41, gruff <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > >> > Hey Archy.  Good seein' you around too.
> >
> > > >> > Capital didn't mysteriously vanish.  Real capital is durable.
>  Bubbles
> > > >> > create faux capital which of course disappears when the bubble
> pops
> > > >> > because it never had anything to it to begin with.  No substance.
>  No
> > > >> > reality.  Never Never Land.  A pinch of pixie dust.
> >
> > > >> > Nor am I saying or implying that socialism is the alternative to
> > > >> > capitalism.  A healthy robust free market economic system founded
> in
> > > >> > capitalism can certainly produce sufficient profits to create not
> only
> > > >> > new capital but to also take care of the basic needs of all it's
> > > >> > citizens so they may be free to be innovative, creative or just
> plain
> > > >> > lazy if they so wish.  A work ethic is not the standard by which
> > > >> > someone gets to live or die.   Nor is there any rule or principle
> > > >> > which dictates that a healthy democratic society can be self-
> > > >> > sustaining for all it's citizens.  A society does not need every
> > > >> > member's active participation in order to be healthy, wealthy,
> wise
> > > >> > and compassionate.  Quite frequently a few can carry the load for
> a
> > > >> > large number of others.  Besides, what do we do with the ones
> deemed
> > > >> > non-self-sustaining?  Find a humane and compassionate way to get
> rid
> > > >> > of them?
> >
> > > >> > On Jun 15, 5:04 pm, archytas <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > >> > > I've never been happy with the term capitalism; some bustard
> always
> > > >> > > seems to want us to forget notions of building it up and
> protecting
> > > >> > > capital in favour of magic wand  tricks done by accountants -
> with the
> > > >> > > capital mysteriously vanishing from our grasp and use. Equally
> unhappy
> > > >> > > that socialism is an alternative.  Freedom under democratic
> respect in
> > > >> > > societies that can sustain themselves is more where I see us
> going if
> > > >> > > we have any sense.  Good to see you about Gruff.
> >
> > > >> > > On 15 June, 19:14, gruff <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > >> > > > Vam, if you were not espousing the paranoia of world
> domination
> > > >> > > > conspiracy theories, then may I suggest that when you send
> someone
> > > >> to
> > > >> > > > a conspiracy website, that you set that parameter up front
> else a
> > > >> > > > person might get suspicious you were of the nature and
> espousing the
> > > >> > > > message of that site.
> >
> > > >> > > > I'm not defensive about it.  I've just been on the
> merry-go-round
> > > >> with
> > > >> > > > conspiracists in the past and to be truthful I've gotten tired
> of
> > > >> > > > their irrational paranoia.  There are more than sufficient
> real
> > > >> > > > problems in the world to want not to deal with unwarranted and
> > > >> > > > emotional paranoia as well.
> >
> > > >> > > > I also don't agree that the point of the alternate view was as
> you
> > > >> > > > describe it.  I can agree with your description but that was
> not
> > > >> what
> > > >> > > > the site was about -- at least to my perception.  It's a
> paranoid
> > > >> > > > conspiracy website that wants to duck and cover from those who
> > > >> > > > allegedly wish to control the world.  Maybe you were able to
> pick
> > > >> the
> > > >> > > > little good out of what was said.  I must have missed it.
> >
> > > >> > > > I also agree with your new rules for global capitalism in that
> they
> > > >> > > > will include a lot of socialist agendas -- as they should.
>  I'm
> > > >> fairly
> > > >> > > > certain we will wind up with a blend of socialism and
> capitalism
> > > >> with
> > > >> > > > the latter supporting the former -- again as it should.  But
> we must
> > > >> > > > be careful that the support of socialist goals does not drown
> the
> > > >> > > > capitalist free market system.
> >
> > > >> > > > On Jun 15, 12:18 am, vamadevananda <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> > > >> > > > > " Vam, I'm sorry but I think you're seeing conspiracies in
> the
> > > >> > > > > mirror."
> >
> > > >> > > > > This is one reason why we signed off last time, Gruff !  You
> > > >> really
> > > >> > > > > don't know what I'm seeing. The link I posted was just that
> : a
> > > >> link
> > > >> > > > > to some descriptions of what the capital and market
> processes
> > > >> actually
> > > >> > > > > involve. If it makes you defensive, as what you write seems
> to
> > > >> > > > > indicate, it isn't really on me ...
> >
> > > >> > > > > The point in the alternate view was that ... it's the same '
> feet
> > > >> of
> > > >> > > > > clay ' story, with obvious greed and power at work. We've
> all
> > > >> lived
> > > >> > > > > with it, and know that ' small mind ' capitalism is what is
> > > >> causing
> > > >> > > > > this disruption cycle of pain and waste. We now also know
> that we
> > > >> can
> > > >> > > > > now aim to establish ' large - mind - universal - empathy '
> > > >> > > > > capitalism, that is more sustainable, honest and
> transparent, and
> > > >> > > > > mutually respecting of life everywhere. That recognises... '
> > > >> excesses,
> > > >> > > > > like accidents, are forever imminent but entirely
> undesirable and
> > > >> > > > > completely avoidable.' That will not only accept moderation
> as a
> > > >> great
> > > >> > > > > and critically important value, but are actually wedded to
> doing
> > > >> > > > > everything to ensure ' moral profits,' healthy competition,'
> and '
> > > >> > > > > productive power of capital and its democratised
> availability.'
> > > >> > > > > Capital may continue to be marshalled by and placed in the
> > > >> judgement
> > > >> > > > > of individuals, but capital will henceforth be social
> assets, free
> > > >> of
> > > >> > > > > its origins in greed and its power purged of frankenstein
> aspects.
> >
> > > >> > > > > The new rules of global capitalism would include a lot of
> > > >> socialistic
> > > >> > > > > goals and values, Gruff ! It's an awakening that has just
> begun to
> > > >> > > > > happen.My call to all linear thinking capitalists and
> socialists,
> > > >> and
> > > >> > > > > the others, is ...  step up, and embrace it.
> >
> > > >> > > > > On Jun 15, 1:29 am, gruff <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > >> > > > > > Sorry Gabby.  Couldn't do that trip.  Along with a major
> fear of
> > > >> > > > > > heights, I can't breathe well at altitudes over 5,000 ft.
> > > >>  However, I
> > > >> > > > > > have experienced a monkish environment  here in the high
> deserts
> > > >> of
> > > >> > > > > > the Southwest.  Very healthful, mentally and spiritually.
> >
> > > >> > > > > > Vam, I'm sorry but I think you're seeing conspiracies in
> the
> > > >> mirror.
> > > >> > > > > > Jekyll island is in Glynn County, Georgia and while it is
> an
> > > >> island in
> > > >> > > > > > the Atlantic Ocean it's not as isolated as the piece
> implies.
> > > >>  It's
> > > >> > > > > > part of the U.S. and can be reached by rowboat, causeway
> or
> > > >> plane.  It
> > > >> > > > > > has a golf club and a few resorts.  And yes, Jekyll Island
> > > >> resorts
> > > >> > > > > > drew the elite for a number of centuries and it is a great
> part
> > > >> of our
> > > >> > > > > > history.  It is also the place where the wealth elite
> gathered
> > > >> to plan
> > > >> > > > > > out a global economy that was not tied to gold but rather
> based
> > > >> on the
> > > >> > > > > > actual value of a nation's production and consumption.  It
> was
> > > >> the
> > > >> > > > > > precursor to Bretton Woods.  Now if you want to get into
> > > >> conspiracy
> > > >> > > > > > theories, Bretton Woods has spawned far more than Jekyll
> Island.
> > > >>  It's
> > > >> > > > > > just that Jekyll Island has a much spookier name and thus
> gets
> > > >> more
> > > >> > > > > > press.
> >
> > > > --
> > > > \--/ Peace
> >
> > > --
> > > (
> > >  )
> > > I_D Allan
> >
> > > Be Paranoid.
> > > God is always building a better idiot!!!
>



-- 
(
 )
I_D Allan

Be Paranoid.
God is always building a better idiot!!!

Reply via email to