Na, the history! What do they teach you about how market dealings had
come about? That God said, let there be a healthy robust free market
economic system and he saw it was good?

On 17 Jun., 14:58, "pol.science kid" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Oh yeah.. they say the capitalist way is the sure way to heaven..and thats
> the path they preach to the comparatively new baby countries that are
> undecided on their path...
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 5:36 PM, gabbydott <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Founded in capitalism?  Did God write up the founding theory for
> > economics too? Is that what they teach you at school?
>
> > On 17 Jun., 02:41, gruff <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > Hey Archy.  Good seein' you around too.
>
> > > Capital didn't mysteriously vanish.  Real capital is durable.  Bubbles
> > > create faux capital which of course disappears when the bubble pops
> > > because it never had anything to it to begin with.  No substance.  No
> > > reality.  Never Never Land.  A pinch of pixie dust.
>
> > > Nor am I saying or implying that socialism is the alternative to
> > > capitalism.  A healthy robust free market economic system founded in
> > > capitalism can certainly produce sufficient profits to create not only
> > > new capital but to also take care of the basic needs of all it's
> > > citizens so they may be free to be innovative, creative or just plain
> > > lazy if they so wish.  A work ethic is not the standard by which
> > > someone gets to live or die.   Nor is there any rule or principle
> > > which dictates that a healthy democratic society can be self-
> > > sustaining for all it's citizens.  A society does not need every
> > > member's active participation in order to be healthy, wealthy, wise
> > > and compassionate.  Quite frequently a few can carry the load for a
> > > large number of others.  Besides, what do we do with the ones deemed
> > > non-self-sustaining?  Find a humane and compassionate way to get rid
> > > of them?
>
> > > On Jun 15, 5:04 pm, archytas <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > I've never been happy with the term capitalism; some bustard always
> > > > seems to want us to forget notions of building it up and protecting
> > > > capital in favour of magic wand  tricks done by accountants - with the
> > > > capital mysteriously vanishing from our grasp and use. Equally unhappy
> > > > that socialism is an alternative.  Freedom under democratic respect in
> > > > societies that can sustain themselves is more where I see us going if
> > > > we have any sense.  Good to see you about Gruff.
>
> > > > On 15 June, 19:14, gruff <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > Vam, if you were not espousing the paranoia of world domination
> > > > > conspiracy theories, then may I suggest that when you send someone to
> > > > > a conspiracy website, that you set that parameter up front else a
> > > > > person might get suspicious you were of the nature and espousing the
> > > > > message of that site.
>
> > > > > I'm not defensive about it.  I've just been on the merry-go-round
> > with
> > > > > conspiracists in the past and to be truthful I've gotten tired of
> > > > > their irrational paranoia.  There are more than sufficient real
> > > > > problems in the world to want not to deal with unwarranted and
> > > > > emotional paranoia as well.
>
> > > > > I also don't agree that the point of the alternate view was as you
> > > > > describe it.  I can agree with your description but that was not what
> > > > > the site was about -- at least to my perception.  It's a paranoid
> > > > > conspiracy website that wants to duck and cover from those who
> > > > > allegedly wish to control the world.  Maybe you were able to pick the
> > > > > little good out of what was said.  I must have missed it.
>
> > > > > I also agree with your new rules for global capitalism in that they
> > > > > will include a lot of socialist agendas -- as they should.  I'm
> > fairly
> > > > > certain we will wind up with a blend of socialism and capitalism with
> > > > > the latter supporting the former -- again as it should.  But we must
> > > > > be careful that the support of socialist goals does not drown the
> > > > > capitalist free market system.
>
> > > > > On Jun 15, 12:18 am, vamadevananda <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > " Vam, I'm sorry but I think you're seeing conspiracies in the
> > > > > > mirror."
>
> > > > > > This is one reason why we signed off last time, Gruff !  You really
> > > > > > don't know what I'm seeing. The link I posted was just that : a
> > link
> > > > > > to some descriptions of what the capital and market processes
> > actually
> > > > > > involve. If it makes you defensive, as what you write seems to
> > > > > > indicate, it isn't really on me ...
>
> > > > > > The point in the alternate view was that ... it's the same ' feet
> > of
> > > > > > clay ' story, with obvious greed and power at work. We've all lived
> > > > > > with it, and know that ' small mind ' capitalism is what is causing
> > > > > > this disruption cycle of pain and waste. We now also know that we
> > can
> > > > > > now aim to establish ' large - mind - universal - empathy '
> > > > > > capitalism, that is more sustainable, honest and transparent, and
> > > > > > mutually respecting of life everywhere. That recognises... '
> > excesses,
> > > > > > like accidents, are forever imminent but entirely undesirable and
> > > > > > completely avoidable.' That will not only accept moderation as a
> > great
> > > > > > and critically important value, but are actually wedded to doing
> > > > > > everything to ensure ' moral profits,' healthy competition,' and '
> > > > > > productive power of capital and its democratised availability.'
> > > > > > Capital may continue to be marshalled by and placed in the
> > judgement
> > > > > > of individuals, but capital will henceforth be social assets, free
> > of
> > > > > > its origins in greed and its power purged of frankenstein aspects.
>
> > > > > > The new rules of global capitalism would include a lot of
> > socialistic
> > > > > > goals and values, Gruff ! It's an awakening that has just begun to
> > > > > > happen.My call to all linear thinking capitalists and socialists,
> > and
> > > > > > the others, is ...  step up, and embrace it.
>
> > > > > > On Jun 15, 1:29 am, gruff <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > Sorry Gabby.  Couldn't do that trip.  Along with a major fear of
> > > > > > > heights, I can't breathe well at altitudes over 5,000 ft.
> >  However, I
> > > > > > > have experienced a monkish environment  here in the high deserts
> > of
> > > > > > > the Southwest.  Very healthful, mentally and spiritually.
>
> > > > > > > Vam, I'm sorry but I think you're seeing conspiracies in the
> > mirror.
> > > > > > > Jekyll island is in Glynn County, Georgia and while it is an
> > island in
> > > > > > > the Atlantic Ocean it's not as isolated as the piece implies.
> >  It's
> > > > > > > part of the U.S. and can be reached by rowboat, causeway or
> > plane.  It
> > > > > > > has a golf club and a few resorts.  And yes, Jekyll Island
> > resorts
> > > > > > > drew the elite for a number of centuries and it is a great part
> > of our
> > > > > > > history.  It is also the place where the wealth elite gathered to
> > plan
> > > > > > > out a global economy that was not tied to gold but rather based
> > on the
> > > > > > > actual value of a nation's production and consumption.  It was
> > the
> > > > > > > precursor to Bretton Woods.  Now if you want to get into
> > conspiracy
> > > > > > > theories, Bretton Woods has spawned far more than Jekyll Island.
> >  It's
> > > > > > > just that Jekyll Island has a much spookier name and thus gets
> > more
> > > > > > > press.
>
> --
> \--/ Peace

Reply via email to