I used to liken it to the "Perils of Pauline" because I seemed to
escape like that old silent film drama. Now, I consider my life as an
interesting one- one I have tried to make sense of and I think I
succeeded in many ways- but I'll die anyway! :-) I think everyday of
those who have been caught up in war or sub-human conditions and try
to be grateful and humble. My troubles and turmoil are/were
miniscule.//I tried to write lyrics for a composer friend but found it
hard to write to his competed music- I think it's easier to shape the
music to words- how about you?//I quit drinking nearly a year ago and
am much happier with life and others.

On Jun 28, 8:07 am, DarkwaterBlight <[email protected]> wrote:
> Interesting that you bring up the point of 'creator types'! I'm a song
> writer/musician and I have been greatly influenced by my relationships
> in my music and writing. It seems when there is much turmoil the music
> and lyrics flow. Vam is correct in saying that it's not possible to
> succeed in turning our emotions off and truly that was never my intent
> but as a defense mechanism I have learned to stuff them. It proves to
> be detrimental in some ways, particularly in writing. I have blocked
> much of my muse in trying to minimize the drama. Truth is that life is
> just that, a set in which we all play out our own dramas. I was once
> told by a woman I dated that I love drama and created it. I perceived
> it as her projecting her own tendencies on me ut she may have been
> correct to some extent. I did alot of writing around that time! LOL!
>
> On Jun 28, 5:15 am, rigsy03 <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > A number of creator types stay single or have arrangements that allow
> > for a good deal of freedom but that does not guarantee inspiration in
> > and of itself. Often, creativity feeds just as well on pressured
> > enviornments and committments.//I doubt most children feel better off
> > without both parents but the notion of family has changed greatly so
> > perhaps they adapt better these days. And a wretched marriage is
> > wretched for all plus what is lonlier than a bad marriage? Sometimes
> > it seems strange that I took to motherhood considering...But
> > motherhood has also changed, hasn't it?
>
> > On Jun 27, 1:49 pm, vamadevananda <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > " I have turned my emotional switch to 0."
>
> > > We all do that. And can never succeed, because emotions are another
> > > name of human experience. They are ours.
>
> > > Yes, some of us are better off without life partner relationships.
> > > Mostly, for the sake of the other. Rarely, for oneself ... for some
> > > higher priority we must pursue.
>
> > > On Jun 27, 11:18 pm, DarkwaterBlight <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > Spiritual Crisis? Yes I believe you may be correct in your
> > > > observation. I think I have developed a willful ignorance or lack of
> > > > empathy when it comes to emotions. I have tried to share my feelings
> > > > to no avail and have been left dissapointed and feeling broken. So in
> > > > an attenpt to heal I have turned my emotional switch to 0. I can see
> > > > my own spiritual crisis and do not wish to have the responsibility of
> > > > someone elses 'baggage' as rigsy03 has pointed out. After our
> > > > seperation I tryed again to no avail and yet I still try to make that
> > > > connection and keep hitting the same brick wall. I know the answer
> > > > lies within myself but I'm not sure if I want to know it. I guess I
> > > > like living in the dillusion that I am fine being alone in life. I
> > > > know that is never true as we all have each other but I am refering to
> > > > a permanant mate and partner in life. It's too easy for me to give up
> > > > on the idea rather than trying so hard and fighting to keep a
> > > > relationship. I know too well that there are many fish in the sea and
> > > > I love seafood.
>
> > > > On Jun 26, 12:54 pm, vamadevananda <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > " Emotionally draining, we literally sucked the life out of each
> > > > > other."
>
> > > > >   Do you believe or are able to conceive, in the face of your contrary
> > > > > experience, that it is possible for two people to graduate to ' giving
> > > > > life to each other,' rather than sucking, to ' enriching each other
> > > > > emotionally,' than draining ?
>
> > > > >   Do you recall the movie sketching the life an authoress, played by
> > > > > Kate Winslet, and her male live - in fan, whose disappointments and
> > > > > spiritual crisis in later age anyone could empathise with !
>
> > > > > On Jun 26, 7:41 pm, DarkwaterBlight <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > Truly I did have expectations, in the begining of my marriage, that
> > > > > > were the fairy tale type. Reality struck hard early on in our
> > > > > > realtionship, we were both poor and from dysfunctional backrounds. 
> > > > > > We
> > > > > > were very aware of the pitfalls in life and dated 4 years before
> > > > > > getting married. When we finally did get married, she was 5 months
> > > > > > pregnant. We have three children who are 4 yearrs apart in age now 
> > > > > > and
> > > > > > our youngest is going to be 9. We were, (and probably still are) in
> > > > > > love. It doesn't make a lot of sense to me so it's really hard to
> > > > > > explain. I know that she would have me back and I would too but it
> > > > > > makes absolutely no sense. There is no logical explaination I can 
> > > > > > give
> > > > > > but I will never allow myself to feel that way about another woman
> > > > > > because it is too painful. Emotionally draining, we literally sucked
> > > > > > the life out of each other.
>
> > > > > > On Jun 26, 12:33 am, ashok tewari <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > It does, Slip, but does not indicate if the case was one of fairy 
> > > > > > > tale
> > > > > > > expectations from relationships in ' love,' to start with.
>
> > > > > > > On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 5:00 AM, Slip Disc <[email protected]> 
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > All cultural disparity aside, Vam, the "imho" (in my humble 
> > > > > > > > opinion)
> > > > > > > > clearly indicates the subjectivity in the statement.
>
> > > > > > > > On Jun 25, 4:49 pm, vamadevananda <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > " Imho, being 'in love' is, as Arch says, a fairy tale."
>
> > > > > > > > > Wouldn't it be more accurate to state that of ' love,' as you 
> > > > > > > > > or Arch
> > > > > > > > > understand or mean it ! ? It would be a great service to let 
> > > > > > > > > your
> > > > > > > > > readers know that and, better still, to actually state what 
> > > > > > > > > you
> > > > > > > > > understand or what your ' love ' means to you, as in what it 
> > > > > > > > > does to
> > > > > > > > > you, how it affects you, what place it has in your hierarchy 
> > > > > > > > > of
> > > > > > > > > values ?
>
> > > > > > > > > For instance, if you've fallen for the fairy tale kind of 
> > > > > > > > > love, you
> > > > > > > > > will end up with disappointments appropriate to fairy tale 
> > > > > > > > > kind of
> > > > > > > > > love !
>
> > > > > > > > > And, this isn't semantics.
>
> > > > > > > > > On Jun 25, 7:29 pm, DarkwaterBlight 
> > > > > > > > > <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > > I guess depending on how fast you want to travel it could 
> > > > > > > > > > be both! I'
> > > > > > > > > > have been reluctant to reply to this thread but I do share 
> > > > > > > > > > some of
> > > > > > > > > > your views PSK. Truth is that I have been married for close 
> > > > > > > > > > to 20
> > > > > > > > > > years now but I have not lived with my wife for clos to 5 
> > > > > > > > > > years. We
> > > > > > > > > > are both much happier than we were when we lived together. 
> > > > > > > > > > I have had
> > > > > > > > > > a few long term relationships since and they were just too 
> > > > > > > > > > much for me
> > > > > > > > > > personally. I have a GF now and she wants to pin me down, I 
> > > > > > > > > > feel
> > > > > > > > > > smothered. We lived together for a while and I wound up 
> > > > > > > > > > excomunicating
> > > > > > > > > > her from the solice of my abode. We are still 'together' 
> > > > > > > > > > but during
> > > > > > > > > > the course of our 1 year relationship I have had (and still 
> > > > > > > > > > do have) a
> > > > > > > > > > few different partners including her best friend who has 
> > > > > > > > > > shared our
> > > > > > > > > > bed on different occasions. She want's monagamy until we 
> > > > > > > > > > GET MARRIED!
> > > > > > > > > > Imagine that! I'm still married to the mother of my 
> > > > > > > > > > children and I
> > > > > > > > > > don't see that changing. Polyamorous relationships ARE 
> > > > > > > > > > possible but it
> > > > > > > > > > takes complete transparancy and a strong commitment to your
> > > > > > > > > > 'significant' other. I, however transparent I may be, can 
> > > > > > > > > > only be
> > > > > > > > > > commited to being a father and a good friend! I love her 
> > > > > > > > > > and all of
> > > > > > > > > > the women who I have 'known' equally. The love that some 
> > > > > > > > > > women require
> > > > > > > > > > I cannot and will not provide. Too emotional and without 
> > > > > > > > > > logic! Imho,
> > > > > > > > > > being 'in love' is, as Arch says, a fairy tale.
>
> > > > > > > > > > On Jun 25, 5:33 am, "pol.science kid" 
> > > > > > > > > > <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > > > Thats the beauty isnt it..our own separatre 
> > > > > > > > > > > roads..running parrallel
> > > > > > > > to some
> > > > > > > > > > > at some point departing ..reconnecting 
> > > > > > > > > > > again...intersecting with
> > > > > > > > some...or
> > > > > > > > > > > is it more like a river...
>
> > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 12:09 PM, vamadevananda <
> > > > > > > > [email protected]>wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > You have to take your own journey forward, your way, 
> > > > > > > > > > > > with your
> > > > > > > > desires
> > > > > > > > > > > > and ideas, and your suppositions or beliefs. That 
> > > > > > > > > > > > learning curve
> > > > > > > > can
> > > > > > > > > > > > hardly be progressed upon by wishing, opinionation or 
> > > > > > > > > > > > argumentation
> > > > > > > > on
> > > > > > > > > > > > a discussion forum. Make your choices, have the 
> > > > > > > > > > > > experience, and
> > > > > > > > know
> > > > > > > > > > > > and conclude for yourself !
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > I've stated my conclusions, from my experience and 
> > > > > > > > > > > > understanding.
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > On Jun 25, 11:19 am, "pol.science kid" 
> > > > > > > > > > > > <[email protected]>
> > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > and is it not possible to celebrate that oneness in 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > multitudes.. why
> > > > > > > > > > > > > settle down.. i do not say.. have a string of 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > affairs...wat i am
> > > > > > > > saying
> > > > > > > > > > > > here
> > > > > > > > > > > > > is.. that completeness can come by sharing with more 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > than one..
> > > > > > > > two does
> > > > > > > > > > > > not
> > > > > > > > > > > > > always have to form a single unit.. it can be three 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > or four or
> > > > > > > > > > > > watever...wat
> > > > > > > > > > > > > we are told mostly.. there is the one for you...but 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > that is not
> > > > > > > > wat i
> > > > > > > > > > > > want
> > > > > > > > > > > > > to believe nor will i believe it.. it is 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > circumstances that make
> > > > > > > > us
>
> ...
>
> read more »- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Reply via email to