" By everything is meant everything ..." What is " everything " to a child is not the same as what ' everything ' would mean to an adult ... it is only what YOU conceive of the inclusions !
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 4:47 PM, RP Singh <[email protected]> wrote: > I cannot perceive the distant parts of the universe and I can't even > imagine what they are , but someone out there sees them and doesn't see me. > Does that mean that there are many perceptions and many negations ., does > it mean you see and I do not see? And I see and you do not see? Vam , you > are being ridiculous and I am speaking for the idea and not for you. By > everything is meant everything , all the elements which have a rudimentary > type of consciousness they also are not.The entire universes are alive in > the sense that there is vibration everywhere and by nothing is meant total > absence of vibration meaning nothing , just the abstract intelligence and > existence. > > On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 3:46 AM, ashok tewari <[email protected]>wrote: > >> " When we say that the universe came out of nothing we mean the negation >> of everything." >> >> Correction : Everything ... limited to what YOU perceive, experience, >> imagine or know, or can in future. >> >> That would still leave much else ... all that you do not or cannot feel, >> think, imagine or know. Why is it so difficult to accept this truism ? >> >> Search yourself. How can YOU negate what you do not perceive, experience, >> feel, think of, imagine or know ? >> >> On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 11:36 AM, RP Singh <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> When we say that the universe came out of nothing we mean the negation of >>> everything. And what is the intelligence which is nothing or the negation of >>> everything , it is existence. You cannot call existence to exist because it >>> is the basis of that which exist. You read the ancient upanisads and maybe >>> you will have the groundwork that goes into understanding God , Reality , >>> Truth or Atman. I prefer Atman before Brahman because I don't believe in >>> individual souls. To me we are all just ahamkaras or egos and have just >>> this lifetime and it is Atman who is in everything animate and inanimate and >>> it is existence and intelligence itself. >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 10:27 PM, facilitator <[email protected]>wrote: >>> >>>> I am back for a bit. Just thought I would give everyone a heads up. >>>> Something I have allowed to bolster my understanding of the human >>>> condition.....People are messed up. >>>> >>>> "Philosophy is good for nothing, that's good, since nothing doesn't >>>> exist". >>>> (Murray) >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> ASHOK TEWARI >> > > -- ASHOK TEWARI
