Everything means the whole universe and if you exist separately from the universe , I , of course , don't include you.
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 6:49 AM, ashok tewari <[email protected]> wrote: > " By everything is meant everything ..." > > What is " everything " to a child is not the same as what ' everything ' > would mean to an adult ... it is only what YOU conceive of the inclusions ! > > On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 4:47 PM, RP Singh <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I cannot perceive the distant parts of the universe and I can't even >> imagine what they are , but someone out there sees them and doesn't see me. >> Does that mean that there are many perceptions and many negations ., does >> it mean you see and I do not see? And I see and you do not see? Vam , you >> are being ridiculous and I am speaking for the idea and not for you. By >> everything is meant everything , all the elements which have a rudimentary >> type of consciousness they also are not.The entire universes are alive in >> the sense that there is vibration everywhere and by nothing is meant total >> absence of vibration meaning nothing , just the abstract intelligence and >> existence. >> >> On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 3:46 AM, ashok tewari <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> " When we say that the universe came out of nothing we mean the negation >>> of everything." >>> >>> Correction : Everything ... limited to what YOU perceive, experience, >>> imagine or know, or can in future. >>> >>> That would still leave much else ... all that you do not or cannot feel, >>> think, imagine or know. Why is it so difficult to accept this truism ? >>> >>> Search yourself. How can YOU negate what you do not perceive, experience, >>> feel, think of, imagine or know ? >>> >>> On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 11:36 AM, RP Singh <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> When we say that the universe came out of nothing we mean the negation >>>> of everything. And what is the intelligence which is nothing or the >>>> negation >>>> of everything , it is existence. You cannot call existence to exist because >>>> it is the basis of that which exist. You read the ancient upanisads and >>>> maybe you will have the groundwork that goes into understanding God , >>>> Reality , Truth or Atman. I prefer Atman before Brahman because I don't >>>> believe in individual souls. To me we are all just ahamkaras or egos and >>>> have just this lifetime and it is Atman who is in everything animate and >>>> inanimate and it is existence and intelligence itself. >>>> >>>> >>>> On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 10:27 PM, facilitator <[email protected]>wrote: >>>> >>>>> I am back for a bit. Just thought I would give everyone a heads up. >>>>> Something I have allowed to bolster my understanding of the human >>>>> condition.....People are messed up. >>>>> >>>>> "Philosophy is good for nothing, that's good, since nothing doesn't >>>>> exist". >>>>> (Murray) >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> ASHOK TEWARI >>> >> >> > > > -- > ASHOK TEWARI >
