When a little boy asked his guru what is Brahman , the guru said , O..k.
son tell me all that you know one by one what you know and I will tell you
what is Brahman. The pupil said , Is it the sun ? Guru 'not this'  The boy
said , 'the river  Guru , 'not this. and one by one the boy counted out all
that he knew and he received the same answer. Ultimately the boy said , Sir
I have counted out all that I knew and now what is left? Guru smiled at the
boy and said , Son, it is the one where there is no other.Awareness involves
duality , whereas the truth is non-dual  ; where existence or intelligence
is alone the  illusion of  the world is not there.

On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 10:19 AM, ashok tewari <[email protected]>wrote:

> Yes, RP, I would.
>
> Neti - Neti ... Not this, Not this ... means all that catches my fancy, in
> the material or mental or intellectual world, which I come to regard as '
> God,' as in what I feel or think, what idea or settled knowledge I come to
> conclude as it, is NOT IT !
>
> It is not about the universe ... but about about our attachments and
> limitations. Shankar(acharya) and the Upanishads say ... this very universe
> is Brahman ( sarvam khalvidam brahman ... all this is Brahman ) ... this
> very ego is Brahman ( aham brahmasmi ... I am Brahman ).
>
> Please do not ask for more. I am not a teacher, except to a student, which
> you are not.
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 8:41 PM, RP Singh <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Ashok , you are a Hindu and from what I have gathered of the advaita fold.
>> What is neti  neti
>> Will you please explain to me what it means?
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 7:54 AM, ashok tewari <[email protected]>wrote:
>>
>>> " ... whole universe ... "
>>>
>>> Which would include what is known to YOU and all that YOU do not know.
>>>
>>> I'd find it very foolish if I were to negate something I know nothing
>>> about ! That would be what children are likely to do, wishing in and wishing
>>> away ... rather meaninglessly !
>>>
>>> When Nietzsche found " God is dead," he negates the God in our knowledge,
>>> belief and imagination. Which then becomes meaningful.
>>>
>>> What does your negation of the " whole universe " mean ? To YOU ?
>>>
>>> It is easy to talk, RP. It means nothing, if it means nothing to YOU !
>>>
>>> On Aug 19, 2010 at 7:44 PM, RP Singh <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Everything means the whole universe and if you exist separately from the
>>>> universe , I , of course , don't include you.
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 6:49 AM, ashok tewari <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> " By everything is meant everything ..."
>>>>>
>>>>> What is " everything " to a child is not the same as what ' everything
>>>>> ' would mean to an adult ... it is only what YOU conceive of the 
>>>>> inclusions
>>>>> !
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 4:47 PM, RP Singh <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>  I cannot perceive the distant parts of the universe and I can't even
>>>>>> imagine what they are , but someone out there sees them and doesn't see 
>>>>>> me.
>>>>>> Does that mean that there are many  perceptions and many negations ., 
>>>>>> does
>>>>>> it mean you see and I do not see? And I see and you do not see? Vam , you
>>>>>> are being ridiculous and I am speaking for the idea and not for you. By
>>>>>> everything is meant everything , all the elements which have a 
>>>>>> rudimentary
>>>>>> type of consciousness they also are not.The entire universes are alive in
>>>>>> the sense that there is vibration everywhere and by nothing is meant 
>>>>>> total
>>>>>> absence of vibration meaning nothing , just the abstract intelligence and
>>>>>> existence.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 3:46 AM, ashok tewari 
>>>>>> <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> " When we say that the universe came out of nothing we mean the
>>>>>>> negation of everything."
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Correction : Everything ... limited to what YOU perceive, experience,
>>>>>>> imagine or know, or can in future.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> That would still leave much else ... all that you do not or cannot
>>>>>>> feel, think, imagine or know. Why is it so difficult to accept this 
>>>>>>> truism
>>>>>>> ?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Search yourself. How can YOU negate what you do not perceive,
>>>>>>> experience, feel, think of, imagine or know ?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 11:36 AM, RP Singh <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> When we say that the universe came out of nothing we mean the
>>>>>>>> negation of everything. And what is the intelligence which is nothing 
>>>>>>>> or the
>>>>>>>> negation of everything , it is existence. You cannot call existence to 
>>>>>>>> exist
>>>>>>>> because it is the basis of that which exist. You read the ancient 
>>>>>>>> upanisads
>>>>>>>> and maybe you will have the groundwork that goes into understanding 
>>>>>>>> God ,
>>>>>>>> Reality , Truth or Atman. I prefer Atman before Brahman because I don't
>>>>>>>> believe in individual souls. To me we are  all just ahamkaras or egos 
>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>> have just this lifetime and it is Atman who is in everything animate 
>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>> inanimate and it is existence and intelligence itself.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 10:27 PM, facilitator 
>>>>>>>> <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I am back for a bit.  Just thought I would give everyone a heads
>>>>>>>>> up.
>>>>>>>>> Something I have allowed to bolster my understanding of the human
>>>>>>>>> condition.....People are messed up.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> "Philosophy is good for nothing, that's good, since nothing doesn't
>>>>>>>>> exist".
>>>>>>>>>  (Murray)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> ASHOK TEWARI
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> ASHOK TEWARI
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> ASHOK TEWARI
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> ASHOK TEWARI
>

Reply via email to