I don't see why a person can not share them, they are part of life. I have and find no difficulty in sharing them with others. I think Gabby that many of the people have never really come to grips with the episodes and then they have difficulty in sharing them.I think alot of the difficulty is sperating themselves from the actual incident, most of the time it seems many make it more than it really is.
What the heck is wrong with being nuts? Allan On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 2:47 PM, gabbydott <[email protected]> wrote: > If you have had those experiences, why do you still think in terms of truth > and lie??? This doesn't make any sense to me. > > Am 26.11.2010 14:23 schrieb "Pat" <[email protected]>: > > > > On Nov 26, 12:52 pm, gabbydott <[email protected]> wrote: > > Pat, dear, I understand the negative... > Nevertheless, that is irrelevant to my usage. > > > >To me this is a neutral scientific term. > and THAT was how I intended it to be taken. > > > >Tell me, > > which special ability do you have that allows you to make quantative > > statements on ot... > My point of view, which no one else has. ;-) > > To be fair, until another's subjective experience is laid out in full, > I couldn't, in detail, comment upon it. > > If you would like to, for example, take the generic experience of > 'seeing a ghost'; this is an experience 'most people' do not claim to > have had, therefore most people pooh-pooh the concept, as they have no > similar experience with which to compare. Personally, I've seen two > things that, in my opinion, many would have thought to have been a > ghost; however, I don't believe what I saw WAS, in fact, a ghost, as I > know ALL the facts surrounding those experiences including the fact > that both were 'upon awakening' and what was seen was very similar to > the last thing about which I was dreaming. In both cases, I believe > there was an overlapping of dream-to-waking phenomenon that made me > think, for a moment, "wait, that looks like a ghost". But, after it > faded, and I was able to put the dream-related information together > with what my eyes saw, I 'thought differently' about what I'd seen. > That's not to say I don't believe that people can see ghosts, but, as > of yet, although I have two experiences that would have convinced > many, I think there is a simpler explanation. > So you see, I even put my OWN experiences to a very stringent tests > and, only when I can find no other plausible reason, then, and only > then, do I consider that the experience was rare indeed. > > Generalisations ARE just that, generalisations. They don't address > specific scenarios. If you want to talk specifics, you'll have to > site an example and give me ALL the information regarding it. Only > then do I stand a chance at answering any questions about it. > > > >What do you think makes > > your experiences more special? > I've had them and I know the full details OF them. "Most people", > when hearing the details, would think I'm either a liar or a > lunatic...but they weren't there and would think otherwise had they > been. > > > > > Am 26.11.2010 13:18 schrieb "Pat" <[email protected]>: > > > > > On Nov 25, 5:54 pm, gabbydott <[email protected]> wrote:> Pat, Pat, > Pat... writing in his most... > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text - > > -- ( ) I_D Allan Be Paranoid. God is always building a better idiot!!!
