Somwhat like the belief that at the end of the Kali Yuga all things return to The One as to report or as vessels of information... to start anew the great cycle of all the Yugas. Hmm!
On Dec 8, 2:11 pm, Ash <[email protected]> wrote: > On 12/8/2010 12:26 PM, Pat wrote: > > > > > > > On Dec 8, 4:57 pm, DarkwaterBlight<[email protected]> wrote: > >> Not to mention that "work" is also kinetic energy! ;) > > > There is nothing that isn't energy. Well, to my knowledge, I, nor no > > one of which I know, has discovered anything that isn't some form of > > energy. The only argument I can think of that may lead someone there > > is if someone demanded that 'nothing' had to consist of some > > underlying substance (although I view that argument as a false > > premiss, as nothing is simply that which does not exist and has NO > > substance). If one conceded an underlying substance to 'nothing', > > then that substance could be called 'non-existence' and MAY, in a > > twisted way, be viewed as something other than energy; but, as non- > > existence, by definition, does not exist, one would never find > > anything--even to the inclusion of a 'nothing'--that would be made of > > it. > > > Like I said, it's the only arguent that leads anywhere close; but, I > > thik it's a black hole of an idea in that the idea sucks so much, it > > sucks itself to oblivion. ;-) > > An idea I have been enjoying even more than 'all is energy' is that "all > is information". In my view whereas we can say 'all is energy' we mean > composition but abstracting any phenomena, object, interaction into > types of information promotes a fundamentally universal layer to compare > vastly divergent fields: eg the accumulation of density producing > gravity (which could be seen as another density in space/time), and the > similarities to dynamically evolving, self organizing systems of > information (life, virii) as a higher form of information (greater ratio > of potential:matter-density) as the formula to understand the > similarities and differences of how (factors) each operates within their > environments (space/time). This to me would also eventually lead to key > identifiers for what we are (potentials), where we are (bounded > attraction differentials). A consequence of this system is the inherent > intelligence of the cosmos. I can't put it into words well right now, > but I see that many earlier ideas have helped spawn this and the name > that's stuck with me is 'super-intelligent design'. More pseudoscience > than anything really until I can rerun my memory/experiences and get it > all written down. (time, time, time...)- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text -
