Hey Gabs,

Or it could not be.  I think that depends on how the individual views
money.

On Mar 1, 8:38 am, gabbydott <[email protected]> wrote:
> Ah, but money is just a means to exercise power and influence others. It
> compensates physical strength to a certain degree. In my view it is the
> direction of human development the so called founders of new beliefs have
> been successful in altering. That's how I also understand vamadevananda's
> activities.
>
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 7:51 AM, iam deheretic <[email protected]> wrote:
> > with rare exception Lee  I think in the case of Scientology it is for the
> > money  but you need control to get the money..  In most cases the founders
> > of beliefs are not interested in money.. it is those that follow which use
> > beliefs as a hussle
> > Allan
>
> > On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 6:27 PM, [email protected] <
> > [email protected]> wrote:
>
> >> Hey Rigsy,
>
> >> Meh!  Don't bother me none mate.
>
> >> I will say that I simply do not belife that mankind has 'created' a
> >> religion for the sole porpose of control, perhaps we will see some in
> >> the future and perhaps we can level that charge at the Scientologist
> >> door, even then I think it is more about making money than control.
>
> >> I will admit that many have used and continues to do so, religoin of
> >> any ilke to control, but that is far differant from the oringinators
> >> intended porpouse.  Yep I really do belive that all religoin can get
> >> one to God.
>
> >> Evil people we have in plenty, and I think there is a lot of
> >> differance between the an original goal and an userption.
>
> >> Like My Blair, taking us to war in the search of WMD, use of the
> >> public has forever been a gameplan of the powerfull, and any tool and
> >> every tool will they use.
>
> >> You say we cannot discount the human reasons that religoins have
> >> existed, I would say we cannot discount the human propensity to twist
> >> things for our own ends.
>
> >> On Feb 27, 5:24 am, rigsy03 <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> > I wish no disrespect to your beliefs but there have been thousands of
> >> > religions during man's history- many claiming absolute truth about God/
> >> > gods. I do not believe all faiths lead to holiness/God as there have
> >> > been too many cruel/evil religions. We cannot discount the human
> >> > reasons that religions have existed: cohesion of a group, control of
> >> > behavior, a spur to conquest, an opiate and so on. A kind, loving
> >> > atheist is also holy in humanistic terms. Religions change or break
> >> > away to adapt to changing social/economic realities- that would be
> >> > understood by Darwin, I believe.
>
> >> > On Feb 25, 7:20 am, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
> >> > wrote:
>
> >> > > Hahah Rigsy.
>
> >> > > Sikhi in a nut shell is this.
>
> >> > > There is but one absolute truth and it is God.
>
> >> > > We are not seprerated from God, but live in the dualistic belife that
> >> > > we are, to realise this one only needs to keep God in the forefront of
> >> > > the mind at all times.(Which is why we chant vaherguru - or wonderous
> >> > > God(losely translated))
>
> >> > > By doing this one eventualy becomes God conciose, rather than man
> >> > > conciouse(Manmukh) and thus their actions become what I suppose we can
> >> > > call 'good'
>
> >> > > So there is no call to doing good as doing good comes as a natural
> >> > > occourance of trying to become God conciouse(Gurmukh)
>
> >> > > You should then be able to infer much from the above, perhaps not the
> >> > > least being, there is no heaven nor hell, as there is no one true
> >> > > faith, all faiths may 'lead' to God.
>
> >> > > On Feb 25, 12:11 pm, rigsy03 <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >> > > > I am impressed by what I read of Sikhism. After a couple of books at
> >> > > > home, I turned to Wikipedia. I remembered about the Golden Temple
> >> and
> >> > > > some other events but they were historical or news items.
>
> >> > > > I, too, am a "slow adapter".
>
> >> > > > I felt badly about jumping from the particular to the universal
> >> > > > regarding some personal experiences for there were positives as well
> >> > > > as negatives. It reminded me I still feel hurt and anger over some
> >> > > > matters and will try harder to pray for understanding. Maybe God
> >> > > > needed my attention! :-) Just kidding...
>
> >> > > > On Feb 23, 9:18 am, "[email protected]" <
> >> [email protected]>
> >> > > > wrote:
>
> >> > > > > Hey Rigsy,
>
> >> > > > > There is nowt to forgive my friend.
>
> >> > > > > Ignorance is not a sin rather a nateural state.  We are all
> >> ignorant
> >> > > > > about many things, untill we take the time to learn, and part of
> >> the
> >> > > > > learning is in the asking.
>
> >> > > > > Realiseing all the time that when we speak in part or on the whole
> >> > > > > about religious belifes we are not dealing in emprical fact but
> >> > > > > beliefe.  Some of which we can apply logical thought to, some....
> >> well
> >> > > > > not so much.  Then I'll say it is my belife that the soul
> >> inhabites
> >> > > > > the body upon conception, or perhaps it is always present, rather
> >> as
> >> > > > > RP suggest as part of the pervadidness of God?
>
> >> > > > > All of us are redemable, in the eys of God if not in the eyes of
> >> each
> >> > > > > other.
>
> >> > > > > I'm a lover of nature(if this is indeed the context which you
> >> mean?)
> >> > > > > it's hard not to be coming from the Pagan background that I do.
> >>  I'm
> >> > > > > also an admirerer of a certin Mr Darwin, and believe in an
> >> absolute
> >> > > > > sense that we arived here via the process of evolution.
>
> >> > > > > So humanity is not somehow seperate from nature but very much a
> >> part
> >> > > > > of it.  Indeed with our abilities it is clear to see how much sway
> >> we
> >> > > > > have over the lives of the other animals that we share this planet
> >> > > > > with.
>
> >> > > > > As to Sikhi, ahh I'm not a good Sikh. Only really because Sikhi
> >> agrees
> >> > > > > with many of my personal belifes about God and Gods plan.
>
> >> > > > > On Feb 23, 2:43 pm, rigsy03 <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >> > > > > > Thank you for your reply and am thinking about it...
>
> >> > > > > > I think this brings up the question of potential and actuality.
> >> (Does
> >> > > > > > the fetus have a soul, for instance. Does an evil person retain
> >> the
> >> > > > > > possibility of redemption- how does this relate to religious and
> >> civil
> >> > > > > > laws? Etc.)
>
> >> > > > > > Yes- I just get my hopes up and then...HIstory is indeed a dance
> >> back
> >> > > > > > and forth but so is an individual life. We are certainly living
> >> in
> >> > > > > > "interesting times" (Chinese wish that can be taken two ways.)
>
> >> > > > > > My "man" just cleared another large snowfall- I think we are up
> >> to 72"
> >> > > > > > and may hit 90" by the end of March. So my spirit is curious but
> >> my
> >> > > > > > mind is distracted. :-)
>
> >> > > > > > How does Nature figure into your beliefs? I admit I am quite
> >> ignorant
> >> > > > > > about the Sikh faith and tend to limit it to Punjab and turbans.
> >> > > > > > Please forgive my poor education- thus far.
>
> >> > > > > > On Feb 23, 5:01 am, "[email protected]" <
> >> [email protected]>
> >> > > > > > wrote:
>
> >> > > > > > > Hey RP,
>
> >> > > > > > > Yeah I get what you are saying.
>
> >> > > > > > > I see a disctiction though.
>
> >> > > > > > > I belive that before anything existed there was only God.
> >>  That is
> >> > > > > > > before the creation, before matter ther was only God, God in
> >> spirt.
> >> > > > > > > God created the creation from Gods self.  That is God created
> >> matter
> >> > > > > > > from spirt, so yes I too belive that there exists not one iota
> >> of
> >> > > > > > > matter that does not contian the spirit of God.
>
> >> > > > > > > It goes back to my original question though what is Soul?
>
> >> > > > > > > Is soul simply spirit?
>
> >> > > > > > > No, too much relgious dogma says that only humans can reach
> >> God, or if
> >> > > > > > > you like only humans have soul.  So what is the portion of God
> >> or the
> >> > > > > > > propertie of God that is all pervading?  Flour my freind.
>
> >> > > > > > > All bread (matter) containes the spirt (flour) of God but not
> >> all
> >> > > > > > > bread (matter) containes the soul(yeast) of God.  Humans are
> >> levend
> >> > > > > > > bread, all else is unlevend.
>
> >> > > > > > > I say this because, as I have said too much dogma says it is
> >> so.  As a
> >> > > > > > > religous man, I must place some of my belife structure on some
> >> > > > > > > religious dogma.
>
> >> > > > > > > On Feb 23, 10:37 am, RP Singh <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >> > > > > > > > There is not an atom of matter that doesn't contain the
> >> Spirit ,
> >> > > > > > > > rather everything and everyone is upheld by the spirit.
> >> Hence the
> >> > > > > > > > basis of all whether animate or inanimate is the soul or the
> >> Spirit.
>
> >> > > > > > > > On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 8:26 PM,
> >> [email protected]
>
> >> > > > > > > > <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> > > > > > > > > Hey Rigsy,
>
> >> > > > > > > > > The point of my baking anology was to differantciat
> >> between Soul and
> >> > > > > > > > > Matter.  Yes indeed other raising agents are to be found,
> >> and yes
> >> > > > > > > > > indeed some prefer unlevend bread.  Bread is still bread
> >> made out of
> >> > > > > > > > > some form of flour.
>
> >> > > > > > > > > Sticking to this then in answer to your questions.
>
> >> > > > > > > > > If the yeast is the soul and the flour the matter we can
> >> easily see
> >> > > > > > > > > that not all matter containes soul, although it is still
> >> thought of as
> >> > > > > > > > > the same thing.
>
> >> > > > > > > > > Evilness stems not from the yeast but from the flour.
> >>  That is not
> >> > > > > > > > > from the spirt of God but the minds of mankind.
>
> >> > > > > > > > > I am both a theists and a humanist, I see no contradiction
> >> in this.
> >> > > > > > > > > So yes humanity has progressed for good or ill. How do I
> >> measure it?
> >> > > > > > > > > Probably like you do, in many
>
> ...
>
> read more »- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Reply via email to