Fantastic. I commented on a bunch of them.

dj


On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 11:43 PM, Chris Jenkins
<[email protected]>wrote:

> Gabby, I hope you approve. I tried my best to follow rule #10:
>
>
> https://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.10150334273466494.348470.722681493&l=b50118df79&type=1
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 12:30 AM, Chris Jenkins <[email protected]
> > wrote:
>
>> Actually, we all brought garbage bags, and cleaned up after ourselves. As
>> for finding a job, I've been on the market for over 18 months, with a solid,
>> industry professional resume, and have found nothing. Meanwhile, many of my
>> former colleagues have joined my ranks.
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 12:19 AM, [email protected] <[email protected]>wrote:
>>
>>> The biased media and comics have been trashing conservatives and
>>> ridiculing the Tea Party and various candidiates so you have to expect
>>> some payback.
>>>
>>> How do these protestors expect to find a job or stay in school if they
>>> spend all their time protesting? Who will pay for the clean-up? What
>>> business would risk hiring these people?
>>>
>>> Most loot is not easily transported. :-)
>>>
>>> On Oct 6, 9:40 pm, Don Johnson <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> > I scanned it and agree, a bit bullshitty but one must admire the
>>> hopeful
>>> > tone the writer emits. So the Occupiers are all about coming together
>>> if not
>>> > completely cogent on their reasons for doing so. Where the Tea Party,
>>> to me,
>>> > has mostly been about tax and spending cuts Tthe Occupiers seem, again
>>> to
>>> > me(it's a shame it's still so unclear) to be all about political
>>> corporate
>>> > favoritism. I would hesitate to label the 99%ers as Class Warriors
>>> although
>>> > many of their organizers seem to have this at the top of their agenda.
>>> >
>>> > I'm disappointed in the rhetoric from Conservative mouthpieces like
>>> Limbaugh
>>> > that are trashing the movement. Ridiculing the protestors and so forth.
>>> It
>>> > would make more sense to recognize that there are those that are having
>>> some
>>> > tough times and try to help educate those disaffected folks on the real
>>> > problems which isn't rich people per se. It's bad government. By both
>>> > Republicans and Democrats. In a nutshell, too much wasteful spending
>>> and not
>>> > enough pin-pointed economic stimulus spending.
>>> >
>>> > Thanks for the link to the Boston Group Arch I'll probably read it
>>> again
>>> > soon. These economist make sense but the real problem is going to be
>>> coming
>>> > up with something everyone can swallow. We sure don't need our very own
>>> > Reign Of Terror. Nobody wants to give in here. If I was rich I'd be
>>> tired of
>>> > being called the bad guy all the time unless I really was the bad guy
>>> in
>>> > which case I wouldn't care a fig. I'd take my loot and go somewhere
>>> else.
>>> > God help us all.
>>> >
>>> > dj
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 12:02 PM, archytas <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> > > There's a take on Occupy Wall Street at
>>> >
>>> > >
>>> http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2011/10/matt-stoller-the-anti-politics...
>>> > > - that sounds like Allan - a bit bullshitty (sorry Al - not you)
>>> Chris
>>> > > but an interesting take.
>>> >
>>> > > I can't stand any standard politics now.  It's madness.
>>> >
>>> > > On Oct 6, 8:36 am, Allan H <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> > > > I think there is where the problem lies,,  several decades ago the
>>> > > > revolution was bassed off ideology differences (the Little Red
>>> Book)
>>> > >  this
>>> > > > really was not a valid reason..
>>> >
>>> > > > today I see
>>> > >
>>> http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2011/10/matt-stoller-the-anti-politics...differentworld,,
>>>  especially in the US  also to a
>>> > > > lesser extent Europe..  in the US there are other problems there
>>> are
>>> > > > existing undergrounds outside of police intelligence,,  there are
>>> massive
>>> > > > amounts of weapons out of site and out of mind and other than the
>>> owner
>>> > > no
>>> > > > one knows about them..  Even I still have guns and I no longer live
>>> > > there..
>>> >
>>> > > > The US is extremely Large,, there is also a large community of
>>> motor
>>> > > homes
>>> > > >  which have the ability move and potentially lower the cost of
>>> living..
>>> > > > and organize.. the police are not unsympathetic either as they
>>> often
>>> > > times
>>> > > > in the same or similar situation..
>>> >
>>> > > > I do believe co-op-s will become more plentiful, underground work
>>> will
>>> > > > become more prevalent..  it will change,,  I think the start is in
>>> > > > eliminating the political corruption that is so embedded..
>>> > > > sigh
>>> > > > Allan
>>> >
>>> > > > I hate change ..  but greed is so wide spread.. a tremendous lose
>>> > > > of spirituality  ,,  but fundamentalism  may have some perks in the
>>> end,,
>>> >
>>> > > > On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 5:59 AM, Chris Jenkins <
>>> > > [email protected]>wrote:
>>> >
>>> > > > > I see BoA as an infinitely powerful entity, and can't imagine the
>>> > > behemoth
>>> > > > > falling.
>>> > > > > On Oct 5, 2011 10:18 PM, "archytas" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> > > > > > Pruning ain't the metaphor I'd choose Chris. Dexia Bank has
>>> just gone
>>> > > > > > belly-up - it was 'worth' more than Belgium's GDP. The 'money'
>>> in the
>>> > > > > > banking scam is at factors of ten in comparison with the world
>>> of
>>> > > real
>>> > > > > > work. My view is that it's in the way of capitalism and
>>> democracy.
>>> > > > > > The informed guess is they've been lending to crooks on a scale
>>> > > vastly
>>> > > > > > bigger than the barrel-loads of dollars gone in Iraq and
>>> Afghanistan
>>> > > > > > without securing any 'mineral rights'. The kleft stick is that
>>> they
>>> > > > > > can only make money through the same old scams, so whatever we
>>> put
>>> > > > > > back in (and I mean we) just does it all over again. In an
>>> > > > > > oversimplified way, much of the debt is like you owing me $2
>>> million,
>>> > > > > > Don owing 'Francois' $5 million, me owing Molly (etc.) in an
>>> equation
>>> > > > > > in which, if we cancelled out we're all solvent and I owe Orn a
>>> beer
>>> > > > > > he won'r drink. What goes in the cancelling is the banks - the
>>> debts
>>> > > > > > are so networked it's almost like the $2 million you owe me is
>>> > > > > > balanced by $1.99 million I owe to people who owe you. I've
>>> been
>>> > > > > > teaching the EU figures if anyone is interested (they just tell
>>> this
>>> > > > > > story between EU countries).
>>> >
>>> > > > > > We've finally seen some reporting here. A Wall Street guy came
>>> on and
>>> > > > > > said he was amazed more people weren't protesting as he thought
>>> true
>>> > > > > > unemployment was at 15% - which is what I reckon here. The real
>>> issue
>>> > > > > > to me is jobs and wages. A key figure for me is that the bottom
>>> 50%
>>> > > > > > back in 1980 had 14% of liquid assets (cash more or less) and
>>> that's
>>> > > > > > down to 1% now. Wages have fallen. The debt problem starts
>>> around
>>> > > > > > 1965 and it's similar in form to similar ones around gold
>>> rushes in
>>> > > > > > history. Most people I've seen on television or met in
>>> Manchester
>>> > > > > > don't know much of the economics but are sick of the lack of
>>> > > > > > opportunity.
>>> >
>>> > > > > > I was left a house when my cousin died and had to drop the
>>> price by a
>>> > > > > > fifth to sell. There's no decent unskilled or engineering work
>>> around
>>> > > > > > here and jobs are being lost at some rate. Just up the road we
>>> have
>>> > > > > > 64 years of UK energy supply as shale gas about to be
>>> exploited. I
>>> > > > > > worked on the survey 25 years back. You'd think we'd have a
>>> plan
>>> > > > > > around this but there isn't one.
>>> >
>>> > > > > > Political blather is just about getting the economy moving, our
>>> > > people
>>> > > > > > working. It's all dross. Interestingly, our Republicans
>>> couldn't
>>> > > > > > even fill the seats for the Prime Minister's speech. He's not a
>>> half-
>>> > > > > > wit like Palin but he's claiming his government has dealt with
>>> the
>>> > > > > > banks - yet two of the one's we bailed out are still making the
>>> kinds
>>> > > > > > of losses they were before 2008. One of them,HBOS, was running
>>> a
>>> > > > > > criminal scam that closed many small companies and is not
>>> cooperating
>>> > > > > > with the limited police enquiries.
>>> >
>>> > > > > > I don't think most people know how bad it all is yet. The
>>> collapse of
>>> > > > > > Soc. Gen. and Bank of America should do it - B o A could even
>>> end up
>>> > > > > > Chinese. There are underlying questions on how we get fed if it
>>> all
>>> > > > > > collapses - after all, we're still growing the food.
>>> >
>>> > > > > > On Oct 5, 9:43 pm, Allan H <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> > > > > >> Great time to live,, revolution is always exciting.  Maybe if
>>> the
>>> > > > > bankers
>>> > > > > >> and stock market wake up.
>>> >
>>> > > > > >> Do corporations still agree obey the laws of the state and the
>>> > > United
>>> > > > > >> state..  and if they don't do they lose their corporate skirt
>>> > > > > >> Allan
>>> > > > > >>  On Oct 5, 2011 7:37 PM, "Chris Jenkins" <
>>> > > [email protected]>
>>> > > > > wrote:
>>> >
>>> > > > > >> > Citizens United was one of the worst rulings in the entire
>>> history
>>> > > of
>>> > > > > the
>>> > > > > >> > Supreme Court.
>>> >
>>> > >http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Citizens_United_v._Federal_Election_Comm
>>> .
>>> > > > > ..
>>> >
>>> > > > > >> > Restricting unions while empowering corporations in
>>> political
>>> > > speech
>>> > > > > is one
>>> > > > > >> > of the root problems that Occupy hopes to address.
>>> >
>>> > > > > >> > On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 1:17 PM, ornamentalmind <
>>> > > > > [email protected]
>>> > > > > >> > > wrote:
>>> >
>>> > > > > >> >> It looks like the unions are entering into the fray. No
>>> doubt
>>> > > this
>>> > > > > >> >> will accelerate the attacks on them… such as the proposals
>>> to
>>> > > greatly
>>> > > > > >> >> limit and/or not allow political contributions. Perhaps if
>>> they
>>> > > > > >> >> incorporated….
>>> >
>>> > > > >
>>> http://www.democracynow.org/2011/10/5/as_unions_students_join_occupy_.
>>> > > ..
>>> >
>>> > > > > >> >> On Oct 5, 8:02 am, Chris Jenkins <
>>> [email protected]>
>>> > > wrote:
>>> > > > > >> >> > And thus the need for education. CDO Swaps and other bits
>>> of
>>> > > > > banking
>>> > > > > >> >> > nastiness that prune money from the system while
>>> contributing
>>> > > > > nothing to
>>> > > > > >> >> it
>>> > > > > >> >> > are part of the problem.
>>> >
>>> > > > > >> >> > On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 7:35 PM, archytas <
>>> [email protected]>
>>> > > > > wrote:
>>> > > > > >> >> > > We have Occupy here too - a few tent cities so far -
>>> people
>>> > > also
>>> > > > > >> >> > > making the point they ain't left-wing loonies.  I went
>>> to the
>>> > > > > >> >> > > Manchester one yesterday to ask a few people 'why'?
>>>  I'm not
>>> > > sure
>>> > > > > >> >> > > heard much that was accurate.  Might have a look at
>>> Greece
>>> > > nearer
>>> > > > > >> >> > > Xmas.  Most peopleI met yesterday didn't know what
>>> > > collateral-
>>> > > > > >> >> > > derivative fractional banking was.
>>> >
>>> > > > > >> >> > > On Oct 4, 2:40 pm, Chris Jenkins <
>>> [email protected]
>>> >
>>> > > > > wrote:
>>> > > > > >> >> > > > Well then, reckon we should all grab shovels, yes?
>>> > > > > >> >> > > > On Oct 4, 2011 9:03 AM, "archytas" <
>>> [email protected]>
>>> > > wrote:
>>> >
>>> > > > > >> >> > > > > I guess my picture of normal, Chris, would be of an
>>> > > ostrich
>>> > > > > with
>>> > > > > >> >> its
>>> > > > > >> >> > > > > head in the sand - these being the people not doing
>>> > > > > occupation.
>>> >
>>> > > > > >> >> > > > > On Oct 4, 8:41 am, Allan H <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>> > > > > >> >> > > > >> It is good to see you again Chris and Don..
>>> >
>>> > > > > >> >> > > > >> I was thinking (I know a rare event) last night
>>> only to
>>> > > have
>>> > > > > the
>>> > > > > >> >> topic
>>> > > > > >> >> > > > >> return this morning..
>>> >
>>> > > > > >> >> > > > >> After watching all the demonstrations some thing
>>> emerged
>>> > > > > that
>>> > > > > >> >> does not
>>> > > > > >> >> > > > make
>>> > > > > >> >> > > > >> sense to me nor do I understand. maybe some one
>>> can
>>> > > > > straighten me
>>> >
>>> > ...
>>> >
>>> > read more »- Hide quoted text -
>>> >
>>> > - Show quoted text -
>>>
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to