Statistics also belie the claims made by people about their detached 
judgements.

On Wednesday, February 4, 2015 at 7:38:40 AM UTC, RP Singh wrote:
>
> To be detached means to be equal-minded in all conditions , including 
> death or worse of dear ones , to be serene even when losing all that you 
> own with not a penny left , the worst of insecurity , it is so easy to talk 
> but for a person who loves dear ones who is used to luxury ,to face it all 
> with serenity is in my opinion either madness or just hypothetical 
> thinking. No Allan you have to be emotionally mad to be completely 
> indifferent to major calamities.
>
> On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 12:54 PM, <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> It is possible to be be detached and positive ay the same time
>>
>> تجنب. القتل والاغتصاب واستعباد الآخرين
>> Évitez; assassiner, le viol et l'esclavage des autres
>> Avoid; murder, rape and enslavement of others
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: RP Singh <[email protected]>
>> To: Minds Eye <[email protected]>
>> Sent: Wed, 04 Feb 2015 5:18 AM
>> Subject: Re: Mind's Eye Moral compass
>>
>> So I conclude that detachment is not such a good thing and I would rather 
>> be positive with its chance of going into shock than to be indifferent to 
>> any outcome.
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 8:36 AM, archytas <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Biologically we split fairly well into two temperaments as infants.  
>>> Detachment seems reasonable as an 'ideal type' RP - though it has also been 
>>> the excuse of 'fascist steel' and economists so stupid they imagine they 
>>> act by replicating the scientists' "objectivity" - a mythical state.  Your 
>>> point was taken up by the Freud of 'Modernity and its Discontents' and the 
>>> split between the paranoid-schizoid and 'depressive' positions towards 
>>> life.  Max Weber articulated the rational-legal position as against 
>>> charismatic fascism, but also worried about the iron cage of bureaucracy.  
>>> Heidegger and much eastern philosophy (which we have taken up in the West 
>>> with too much Greek modification and copying) focuses on what it is to be.  
>>> I'm more materialist at the beginning of analysis and think we need to 
>>> understand the big difference between what we can create with technology 
>>> and its business control.  Veblen got to this, but his theory doesn't suit 
>>> the powerful.  Around 1910 we had a lot of active political debate here on 
>>> democratic foreign policy (here people like ED Morel who unseated Churchill 
>>> in Dundee, Wallace in the US and Gandhi).  Even the Nazis had socialists 
>>> who wanted a union of free workers across Europe.  I think we can safely 
>>> say fascism in Weber's sense has won.  The world remains run by oligarchies 
>>> who cut up the booty between them..
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wednesday, February 4, 2015 at 1:33:23 AM UTC, RP Singh wrote:
>>>>
>>>> We can have a positive attitude or a negative attitude , but can we 
>>>> have a neutral attitude?
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 6:16 AM, RP Singh <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I have found that attachment to fruits of actions lead to much 
>>>>> heartbreak when the opposite of your expectation happens. It is written 
>>>>> in 
>>>>> the Gita that a person should live in a state of detachment and be the 
>>>>> same 
>>>>> in the good or bad occurrences , I don't know if this is possible human 
>>>>> nature being what it is , but if we can reach this state I think we can 
>>>>> be 
>>>>> better persons. Everything being history only actions are in our hands 
>>>>> including that of efforts to change ourselves , and the future is 
>>>>> history. 
>>>>> If you are expecting good and something very bad happens it seems like a 
>>>>> shock and for some moment at least you lose your balance but if you are 
>>>>> detached to the fruits of actions you are in a state of coolness and not 
>>>>> shaken by the greatest calamity ever.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 2:44 PM, RP Singh <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> You have to accept before you do and if you cannot accept the process 
>>>>>> stops. You have to keep some framework in your conscious mind to keep a 
>>>>>> conscious check on yourself and it is not a creed but a way of living , 
>>>>>> trying to improve yourself as a person. Now what wrong could be there in 
>>>>>> having self-respect and not being arrogant , what wrong in not being 
>>>>>> greedy 
>>>>>> and not have anger issues. If you want to stop smoking you have to first 
>>>>>> take the decision to stop , then only can you give the effort.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 2:02 PM, archytas <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I don't really do creed Allan.  Found too many people who talk them 
>>>>>>> and mean none.  Chris' statement is probably as close as I get, but 
>>>>>>> this 
>>>>>>> soon doesn't work in practice.  Doing no harm to others quickly proves 
>>>>>>> difficult. We do this in the West simply by living as we do, praying to 
>>>>>>> the 
>>>>>>> Lord or otherwise.  In some philosophy, all speech has a hostile 
>>>>>>> element,as 
>>>>>>> does censorship on what can be said.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The first thing for me is evidence.  This is an extremely difficult 
>>>>>>> topic.  Molly's God is quite acceptable to me, but my evidence is not 
>>>>>>> direct.  I only feel 'him' in her words (even this in evidence terms is 
>>>>>>> inadequate - 'words' - we have never met). 
>>>>>>> The next is probably what Allan is trying to do here.  I have some 
>>>>>>> conception of myself as a person and the turmoil of my thought and 
>>>>>>> making 
>>>>>>> sense of stuff.  Other people have often proved to have much better 
>>>>>>> (and 
>>>>>>> much worse) ideas and been prepared to share them.  George Kelly 
>>>>>>> springs to 
>>>>>>> my mind on this - http://www.centrepcp.co.uk/whatis.htm - and 
>>>>>>> personal construct theory.
>>>>>>> I approve Allan's efforts here (though it's important to me he need 
>>>>>>> no such approval) - but immediately think we have a lot of material 
>>>>>>> from 
>>>>>>> all over the world and hundreds of different cultures (there are this 
>>>>>>> many 
>>>>>>> on Papua New Guinea alone).  What of the evidence we have from them, 
>>>>>>> against our predominantly 'white insularity'?
>>>>>>> Evidence, imagination and trying to do the right thing.  Read about 
>>>>>>> Socrates in Plato, but remember the fine words came from the free table 
>>>>>>> at 
>>>>>>> the head of a slave society.  Hear about the Good Samaritan, but wonder 
>>>>>>> why 
>>>>>>> we still have a society of 'worthies' that just pass on by, perhaps to 
>>>>>>> their church of peace.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Gabby doesn't live down a rabbit hole in Seven Acres Park Allan.  I 
>>>>>>> thought she might not be answering the dogs' knocks because she doesn't 
>>>>>>> like me, so asked the woman with the ferrets (she is real) to have them 
>>>>>>> check.  The world of imagination is such that when Gabbs says 'it 
>>>>>>> smells in 
>>>>>>> here' it could be because she has just come in, or she may be the 
>>>>>>> little 
>>>>>>> child pointing out the Emperor is naked.  Language is harder than we 
>>>>>>> think.  I have 'one smart little cookie' in mind about Gabby. This 
>>>>>>> could be 
>>>>>>> chronic sexism, patronising, an insult to cookies - or a quick utter of 
>>>>>>> something I think that isn't quite that - or an offer to be beaten up 
>>>>>>> by 
>>>>>>> politically correct bullies.  Walk with me into the rabbit hole of 
>>>>>>> !Kung 
>>>>>>> society - we would find no adult twins and we might ponder genetics - 
>>>>>>> in 
>>>>>>> fact, infanticide is common in their tough world.  Would we think badly 
>>>>>>> of 
>>>>>>> them?  They have creed.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It goes dark at night, therefore big bang.  I prefer the way 
>>>>>>> scientists explain this to instruments of torture.  Doing no harm to 
>>>>>>> others 
>>>>>>> collapses with je suis charlie. Religion sounds very selfish to me.  
>>>>>>> Yet 
>>>>>>> one can admire Salvation Army people doing a soup run, despite their 
>>>>>>> views 
>>>>>>> on homosexuality.  Would I kill the second born twin?  Down the !Kung 
>>>>>>> rabbit hole I probably would as !Kung.  So where does creed come from?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'd like us to live in evidence based practice.  Why we still speak 
>>>>>>> of creed in today's world of Public Relations appals me.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sunday, February 1, 2015 at 10:07:28 PM UTC, Allan Heretic wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Neil are you sure Cabbies hiding in a rabbit hole??  Would like the 
>>>>>>>> guidelines she  and the rest of the ME following..
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> تجنب. القتل والاغتصاب واستعباد الآخرين
>>>>>>>> Avoid; murder, rape and enslavement of others
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>>>> From: Chris Jenkins <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>> To: Minds-Eye <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>> Sent: Sun, 01 Feb 2015 9:13 PM
>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: Mind's Eye Moral compass
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It's difficult to boil something as complex as personal moral 
>>>>>>>> relativism down into some simple edicts. I suppose the closest I could 
>>>>>>>> add 
>>>>>>>> would be:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>  - If it harms none, do as you will. 
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 2:37 PM, Allan H <[email protected]> 
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I hope others doctrine their personal moral ideas to the 
>>>>>>>>> discussion.  The more we have the better ,, that includes you Chris. 
>>>>>>>>> And 
>>>>>>>>> Neil.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> تجنب. القتل والاغتصاب واستعباد الآخرين
>>>>>>>>> Avoid; murder, rape and enslavement of others
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>>>>> From: RP Singh <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>> To: Minds Eye <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>> Sent: Sun, 01 Feb 2015 3:37 PM
>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: Mind's Eye Moral compass
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> My moral compass
>>>>>>>>> Don't fear anything , but use your reasoning faculty to do the 
>>>>>>>>> right thing.
>>>>>>>>> do not covet but earn and save for the needs of yourself and 
>>>>>>>>> family.
>>>>>>>>> Do not be lustful but be happy with your spouse.
>>>>>>>>> Do not be arrogant but respect yourself and others.
>>>>>>>>> Don't be angry but take care to do your duties.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 7:20 PM, Allan H <[email protected]> 
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> If you want a social experiment we need to set up moral 
>>>>>>>>>> guidelines from which to work..  if you disagree with them  that is 
>>>>>>>>>> fine. 
>>>>>>>>>> ,, no problem..  just remember it really is a social experiment,, 
>>>>>>>>>> you need 
>>>>>>>>>> to come up with what your personal moral compass to replace it..  it 
>>>>>>>>>> is not 
>>>>>>>>>> a cut and paste exercise.  My compass is around 500 created in 
>>>>>>>>>> length,, 
>>>>>>>>>> presentations  should around that length.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>   My Compass:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Love the Allfather with my whole Soul & being...
>>>>>>>>>> Love my neighbor as myself
>>>>>>>>>> As I judge other so too will I be judge
>>>>>>>>>> Do No Harm
>>>>>>>>>> Avoid murder, rape or enslavement of others
>>>>>>>>>> Avoid being enslaved by possessions
>>>>>>>>>>  ~~~※☆※~~~
>>>>>>>>>> Jesus said  "Do not tell lies, and do not do what you hate, for 
>>>>>>>>>> all things are plain in the  light of Heaven. For nothing hidden 
>>>>>>>>>> will not 
>>>>>>>>>> become manifest, and nothing covered will remain without being 
>>>>>>>>>> uncovered."
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> تجنب. القتل والاغتصاب واستعباد الآخرين
>>>>>>>>>> Avoid; murder, rape and enslavement of others 
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --- 
>>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the 
>>>>>>>>>> Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group.
>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, 
>>>>>>>>>> send an email to [email protected].
>>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>  -- 
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --- 
>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>>>>>>> Groups ""Minds Eye"" group.
>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, 
>>>>>>>>> send an email to [email protected].
>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --- 
>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>>>>>>> Groups ""Minds Eye"" group.
>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, 
>>>>>>>>> send an email to [email protected].
>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>  -- 
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --- 
>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>>>>>> Groups ""Minds Eye"" group.
>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, 
>>>>>>>> send an email to [email protected].
>>>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  -- 
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --- 
>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>>>>> Groups ""Minds Eye"" group.
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, 
>>>>>>> send an email to [email protected].
>>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>  -- 
>>>
>>> --- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>> Groups ""Minds Eye"" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>> an email to [email protected].
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>
>>
>>  -- 
>>
>> --- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> ""Minds Eye"" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to [email protected].
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>> -- 
>>
>> --- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> ""Minds Eye"" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to [email protected].
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>
>

-- 

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
""Minds Eye"" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to