Good personally I like T=Ok

تجنب. القتل والاغتصاب واستعباد الآخرين
Avoid; murder, rape and enslavement of others

-----Original Message-----
From: archytas <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 12:36 AM
Subject: Re: Mind's Eye Einstein and the Mystics

Just to add some dross Molly, I might say:

1)    God is simple: T=0K

2)    Soul is simple: Quantum of Light

 ( c/d=pi,  R/N=k,  E/M=c^2, h=0, c=0,  i^2=-1, h=E/t,  h=kb,

 h=1, c=1.  h*=h/2pi, c>1,  E=h*f ,  e^2=ach* ,  e^i(pi)= -1)

3)  Everything else (material) is complex.


This translates to creation from the vacuum assuming an absolute of zero 
temperature.  There is an Absolute, Infinite, Eternal Reference Frame and 
 it  is  Vacuum in the condition of Absolute Zero: T=0K,that takes the 
functions of God and create everything in the Universe.   This vacuum is a 
spirit world.To create Material World and everything in It, God uses 
Spiritual Particles.  The modern name of these Spiritual Particles is 
Quantum of Light.  This is the most phenomenal particle in the World. 
 Through the  behavior of  Quantum of  Light we can understand that an 
Absolute God  has the Highest form of Consciousness.

Possible, but gets us nowhere and despite discrete quantum blobs we have no 
picture of any.  This is quite Hindu in origin.  I expect Allan will 
dismiss my equation of soul!

I really do understand the wish to sweep such away with a sweep of Gandalf. 
 The papers I've read demand too much intellect.

On Monday, March 16, 2015 at 10:41:08 PM UTC, archytas wrote:
>
> True and circularly inconsistent at the same time.  
>
> On Monday, March 16, 2015 at 10:35:46 PM UTC, Allan Heretic wrote:
>>
>> Does not matter how you view reality  you are and always be part of it 
>> ..  there then the real question is do you want to be connected or 
>> disconnected to this reality..  totally your choice.
>> And that has nothing to do how I view anything ..
>>
>> تجنب. القتل والاغتصاب واستعباد الآخرين
>> Avoid; murder, rape and enslavement of others
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: archytas <[email protected]>
>> To: [email protected]
>> Sent: Mon, 16 Mar 2015 11:09 PM
>> Subject: Re: Mind's Eye Einstein and the Mystics
>>
>> We can wire up religious brains (you might have to hold Molly down while 
>> I inject the radioactive stuff!) - seriously done with Tibetan monks, nuns 
>> and people speaking in tongues.  Interesting snippets include similar 
>> changes in frontal and parietal lobes across religions and marked decreases 
>> in language centre activity in those speaking in tongues.  Essentially, 
>> religious experience decreases our normal sensing of the outside world - 
>> most of us seem hard-wired into this.
>>
>> I don't do your soul thing, having the issue that reality is the only 
>> place to get a decent meal.  Your system was once described by Paul 
>> Feyerabend in 'Against Method' as 'dream-worlds', a fairly anarchist view. 
>>  There is something non-evaluatory about this I like, but I can't see it 
>> leading anywhere.
>>
>> Pragmatism  is not theism in the traditional sense and turns more to 
>> being the the 'game' with god.  It's not that long since we had little clue 
>> on the electro-magnetic spectrum even though we could see part of it.  
>>
>> On Monday, March 16, 2015 at 9:17:47 PM UTC, Allan Heretic wrote:
>>>
>>> I managed to down load the paper on my phone .. my tablet did not like 
>>> it.
>>> Managed to read part of it i have heard the same arguments earlier .. 
>>> very small print.. as the format is not designed for mobile.. reality is 
>>> our world is going mobile  and there is a need to evolve with it.
>>>
>>> The idea is not to connect religion to science or visa versa .. what 
>>> Einstein realized is science is the study of God.. nothing more.  As 
>>> strange as this is going to sound Neil even you are part of God's being not 
>>> all of it but an independent part.  Capable of accessing the totality of 
>>> the presence as "U"  understand him, not as others want you to understand 
>>> him..  reality is with every soul has a one to one relationship with the 
>>> Presence .  Most souls say they do not want that relationship  and no thank 
>>> you is an acceptable valid answer. 
>>>
>>> تجنب. القتل والاغتصاب واستعباد الآخرين
>>> Avoid; murder, rape and enslavement of others
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: archytas <[email protected]>
>>> To: [email protected]
>>> Sent: Mon, 16 Mar 2015 9:12 PM
>>> Subject: Re: Mind's Eye Einstein and the Mystics
>>>
>>> There is a paper with some of the difficult science in it - 
>>> http://dspace.creighton.edu:8080/xmlui/bitstream/handle/10504/65506/2015-9.pdf?sequence=1
>>>  
>>> and points out that one of the founders of the standard model was a 
>>> Catholic priest.  I think the main questions concern how we might make it 
>>> all simple enough to be widely understandable without the cheating in the 
>>> video.  The most obvious core is truth seeking.
>>>
>>> On Monday, March 16, 2015 at 7:40:18 PM UTC, archytas wrote:
>>>>
>>>> The movie has the science wrong Allan, but we could make one with the 
>>>> real science making the same points in an accurate manner.  Some 
>>>> scientists 
>>>> believe we could progress further in science if we stripped it of even 
>>>> more 
>>>> religion too.  The mystic side often claims that their techniques are 
>>>> simple and everyone can share them.  I don't think this is true and its 
>>>> complicated by emotions be so gullible - yet I want something rather like 
>>>> this and education as we have it fails.  And religious institutions as 
>>>> control frauds are in the way.  We need some dialogue that isn't between 
>>>> 'Dawkins' and fundamentalists.
>>>>
>>>> On Monday, March 16, 2015 at 5:50:53 PM UTC, Allan Heretic wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Excellent video and web page.  There is recall visiting a small museum 
>>>>> hidden under a cover you could lift a cover and read from one of 
>>>>> Eisenstein's journal.. what an exciting moment seeing the actual  work in 
>>>>> his own hand..  ( if we meet here for a visit Neil  we will have to go 
>>>>> and 
>>>>> view this treasure)
>>>>>
>>>>> I agree with out the presence science to me has no value. In the movie 
>>>>> they talk about crossing the time space barrier you cross to make the 
>>>>> connection with the presence and the reservoir of total knowledge 
>>>>> contained 
>>>>> within.
>>>>>
>>>>> تجنب. القتل والاغتصاب واستعباد الآخرين
>>>>> Avoid; murder, rape and enslavement of others
>>>>>
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: archytas <[email protected]>
>>>>> To: [email protected]
>>>>> Sent: Mon, 16 Mar 2015 5:36 PM
>>>>> Subject: Mind's Eye Einstein and the Mystics
>>>>>
>>>>> The most beautiful and profound emotion we can experience is the 
>>>>> sensation of the mystical. It is the sower of all true science. He to 
>>>>> whom 
>>>>> this emotion is a stranger, who can no longer wonder and stand rapt in 
>>>>> awe, 
>>>>> is good as dead.
>>>>> When I examine myself and my methods of thought, I come to the 
>>>>> conclusion that the gift of fantasy has meant more to me than my talent 
>>>>> for 
>>>>> absorbing positive knowledge
>>>>>
>>>>> Einstein.
>>>>>
>>>>> This guy has kindly put together 800 Einstein quotes - 
>>>>> http://www.gurteen.com/gurteen/gurteen.nsf/id/X0001134E/
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> My potted version of Einstein working on Relativity and the quantum is 
>>>>> not so mystical.  The rock and hard place of his time were Maxwell's 
>>>>> great 
>>>>> equations of forces we can't see (mystical sort of) and contradictory 
>>>>> empirical evidence from experiment (Hopf was the great experimenter), 
>>>>>  Newton and Galileo had also 'noticed relativity'.  Einstein read a lot 
>>>>> and 
>>>>> so knew of the rock and hard place.  Even a few school teachers (Abbott) 
>>>>> had noticed the 'relativity of dimensions'.  Einstein had really worked 
>>>>> hard on maths most people still don't do and almost certainly cannot. 
>>>>>  Poincarre and Lorentz had already produced 'mathematical 
>>>>> transformations' 
>>>>> that were the solution seed,  Instead of hammering away trying to prove 
>>>>> Maxwell or the experimenters right, Einstein searched for an underlying 
>>>>> kinematics to reconcile both.  We might now call this a Wittgensteinian 
>>>>> deconstruction, finding what is common deep in apparently conflicting 
>>>>> arguments. 
>>>>>
>>>>> Everyone in this group, except Gabby (no not really, I'm emphasizing 
>>>>> here her important notion of the role of the dunce in the corner, the 
>>>>> speed 
>>>>> of inertial violence) will admit they are short on positive knowledge, 
>>>>> too 
>>>>> idle or unskilled to do what Einstein did.  Of course, we don't have 
>>>>> relativity or quantum physics because of Einstein.  There were many 
>>>>> others 
>>>>> and it is even possible we might have moved further through modified 
>>>>> Newtonianism. 
>>>>>
>>>>> The following short video is a science-religion meet kinda thingy.  I 
>>>>> regard it as utter, exploitative crap, that works on ignorance, 
>>>>> half-baked 
>>>>> ideas and marketing to them.
>>>>>
>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2BiTWFdnd7Q
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> To rework current very silly arguments in which 'bright' people like 
>>>>> Dawkins take on idiot creationists, we need to go down deeper, yet at the 
>>>>> same time not insist participants have 'huge qualifications' in positive 
>>>>> knowledge that attempt to make silk purses out of our sows' ears.  This 
>>>>> is 
>>>>> a tough one.  
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>  -- 
>>>>>
>>>>> --- 
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>>> Groups ""Minds Eye"" group.
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>>>> an email to [email protected].
>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>>
>>>>  -- 
>>>
>>> --- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>> Groups ""Minds Eye"" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>> an email to [email protected].
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>
>>  -- 
>>
>> --- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> ""Minds Eye"" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to [email protected].
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>

-- 

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
""Minds Eye"" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
""Minds Eye"" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to