On Saturday 06 December 2008 02:18:44 duncan wrote: > Ah- that line doesn't completely explain it (it wouldn't explain > Kevin's case at least, as his revision queue should be less than 10 at > that point in some cases since he is using cards that haven't ever > lapsed), but I think it does in conjunction with this line a bit > later: > > if len(grade_0_selected) + grade_0_in_queue == limit or \ > len(revision_queue) >= 10: > return > > So, unless I miss my guess, as long as you have more than 10 cards > that have been seen before, no matter what their grade, it is > impossible for items that have not been seen before to be added to the > queue... does this make sense?
Indeed. The philosophy here is that it's more worthwhile to relearn cards you forgot (in which you already invested a lot of time) as opposed to learning new cards. Peter --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "mnemosyne-proj-users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mnemosyne-proj-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
