On Saturday 06 December 2008 02:18:44 duncan wrote:
> Ah- that line doesn't completely explain it (it wouldn't explain
> Kevin's case at least, as his revision queue should be less than 10 at
> that point in some cases since he is using cards that haven't ever
> lapsed), but I think it does in conjunction with this line a bit
> later:
>
>     if len(grade_0_selected) + grade_0_in_queue == limit or \
>        len(revision_queue) >= 10:
>         return
>
> So, unless I miss my guess, as long as you have more than 10 cards
> that have been seen before, no matter what their grade, it is
> impossible for items that have not been seen before to be added to the
> queue... does this make sense?

Indeed. The philosophy here is that it's more worthwhile to relearn cards you 
forgot (in which you already invested a lot of time) as opposed to learning 
new cards.

Peter

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"mnemosyne-proj-users" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/mnemosyne-proj-users?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to