BTW, are you sure you are using the last version? There was a bug in 1.1 which 
could cause this behaviour. This is why 1.1.1 came out. In 1.2 the scheduling 
did not change.

Duncan and KM, did you upgrade through all the intermediate versions, or did 
you skip a few?

Peter

On Friday 05 December 2008 07:44:06 Peter Bienstman wrote:
> On Friday 05 December 2008 06:58:32 Kevin wrote:
> > I did some more testing and here is what is happening - I import a set
> > of 10 items and they show up in my not memorized queue.  I cycle
> > through them a few times marking them as 1.  I go to import another 10
> > items, expecting that they will be added to the pool of unlearned
> > items along with the previous 10.  They aren't - I can only cycle
> > through the first 10 items regardless of any preferences settings or
> > whether I grade them 0 or 1.
>
> Your revision queue is not rebuild until it is completely empty. If after
> import you go through all of your previous grade 1 cards one more time, the
> newly imported cards should start to show up. Do they?
>
> Peter
>
> > UNTIL... I mark one of the first 10 items as a 2 or higher - then I
> > finally start to get the most recently imported items.  Why does
> > mnemosyne behave this way?
> >
> > To test this I made a dummy deck where the questions and answers were
> > just integer values - integers 1 through 20.  I imported them in two
> > batches of 10 from a tab delimited text file.  The first numbers
> > (1-10) come in and I cycle through them a couple times marking them as
> > 1.  Then I import the next ones (11-20) and start cycling through the
> > cards, but only numbers 1-10 are showing up - restarting mnemosyne
> > doesn't make any difference either.  When I mark one of the 1-10 cards
> > as 2 or higher, then after a few more reps the others finally start to
> > come in.
> >
> > What I would expect is that newly imported items would be added to the
> > pool of questions showing up without having to mark anything as
> > learned - but somehow they aren't pulled into the queue of questions
> > that appear until one of the first imported batch is marked as
> > learned.  I want to build up a stack of unlearned cards (via import)
> > to practice throughout the day before marking any of them as learned
> > until I am ready for it.  I like to do this incrementally because it
> > is like building a tower - I don't move on to adding more unlearned
> > items until I am comfortable enough with the previous ones (although
> > not comfortable enough to mark them as learned).  So, this seems like
> > a bug to me, unless there's some underlying logic to it that I don't
> > understand.
> >
> > Hope my long-winded explanation helps here :) Duncan, what you
> > describe is consistent with my experience and seems to be the same
> > issue.  However, I don't want to let go of my items so soon - I need
> > to practice them for most of the day before I really commit them my
> > 2-3 days memory.  Either way, it seems to be an inconsistency in the
> > way unlearned items are handled - and I want to emphasize again that
> > this doesn't seem to have ANYTHING to do with the number of grade 0
> > cards to hold in hand setting.  Seems to be a completely different
> > issue, especially because we're dealing with grade 1 cards anyway.
> >
> > Thanks
> > km
> > 
-- 
------------------------------------------------
Peter Bienstman
Ghent University, Dept. of Information Technology 
Sint-Pietersnieuwstraat 41, B-9000 Gent, Belgium
tel: +32 9 264 34 46, fax: +32 9 264 35 93
WWW: http://photonics.intec.UGent.be
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------------------------

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"mnemosyne-proj-users" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/mnemosyne-proj-users?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to