Hi SA

Robert Young has written alot about how Darwinist
philosophy and metaphor comes out of Victorian culture.
A theory always reflect the values of its time and author
even if only in the choice of metaphor and language, concepts
etc.

Ta
David M

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Heather Perella" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2007 10:43 PM
Subject: Re: [MD] subject / object logic


>     Ian,
>
>     I watched the YouTube link below and some others
> I found as well that include his discussion.  Natural
> Inclusion instead of natural selection.  Stephen Jay
> Gould emphasized the positive, creative aspect of
> natural selection, in which many have gotten trapped
> into thinking natural selection is about extinction
> and the by-gones that didn't make it.  Gould
> emphasized that science has gotten off-track on this,
> and he goes back in his "Structure of Evolutionary
> Theory" book and pulls out a lot of historical
> context.  He notes where evolutionary science went
> off-track on many occasions, not just with the natural
> sciences emphasis on the negative (in which Darwin
> discussed the positive creative aspect, too).  Gould,
> in this very long book I mentioned, places some of
> this 'off-tracking' of science due to the focus in
> academics on the 'what is known now', instead of also
> learning how 'what is known now' became as such.
> History is full of many compromises, deals, and
> forgetfulness.  Gould mentioned Thomas Kuhn, in which
> this latter person also discusses the mangeling in
> science.
>     Somehow this negative aspect of natural selection
> arose, and it's here.  Either Darwin didn't emphazise
> it enough, or over the years it is this same old SOM
> perspective that focused upon this negative aspect.
> As in the Rayner 'YouTube' in which he uses a piece of
> paper as an example of this inclusionary.  Once the
> paper is torn in half to make it easier to focus on
> one thing instead of bouncing ones perspective back
> and forth, back and forth between two, then the one
> piece of paper will be noticed, and the other
> forgotten.
>     So, maybe it's not so much natural selection, but
> the philosophy behind natural selection that channels
> the results and conclusions people have about it.
>
> Anybody else familar with this negative approach to
> natural selection, but where the positive, creative
> aspect of natural selection was discussed by Darwin?
>
> woods,
> SA
>
>
>
>     [Ian]
>> In simplest terms its about making decisions where
>> alternative views
>> are recognized to be non-exclusive (excluded middles
>> are allowed) -
>> logic is more inclusive, causation more
>> bi-directional. eg The path a
>> river flows is defined by the bed / valley that
>> constrains it, but the
>> river bed / valley is cut by the river itself,
>> neither exclusively
>> causes the other
>> Look for Alan Rayner. There is a new site being
>> developed which is not
>> yet public, but Alan's existing work is here
>> http://people.bath.ac.uk/bssadmr/inclusionality/
>>
>> Here is my blog link to some YouTube videos of Alan
>> explaining himself.
>> http://www.psybertron.org/?p=1395
>> I like the third link best "bewitched by bipolar
>> craziness .... fixed
>> by sellotape" etc.
>>
>> Enjoy.
>> Ian
>>
>> On 9/14/07, Heather Perella
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > What does inclusionality mean?
>> >
>> > SA
>> >
>> >
>> >     [DM]
>> > > Funny how this sounds like inclusionality.
>> > >
>> > > DM
>> > >
>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>>
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>> Archives:
>>
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
>>
>
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________________________________
> Be a better Globetrotter. Get better travel answers from someone who 
> knows. Yahoo! Answers - Check it out.
> http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/?link=list&sid=396545469
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
> 


Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

Reply via email to