> [SA previously]
> By applying the intellectual level, and each
> subsequent level we
> would be wisely applying morals the moq would state.
> By applying
> dynamic quality and thus, clearing the intellectual
> level to new
> open-minded, creative thoughts is morally helpful.
> So, a kind of forgetting, the empty tea cup, is
> very moral. I
> didn't see wiki covering this anywhere.
>
> [Ron]
> I sniped this bit from the opening paragraph, :
> "The semantics of ethics divides naturally into
> descriptivism
> and non-descriptivism. The former position advocates
> the idea that
> prescriptive language (including ethical
> commands and duties) is a subdivision of descriptive
> language and has
> meaning in virtue of the same kind of properties as
> descriptive
> propositions, whereas the latter contends that
> ethical propositions are
> irreducible
> in the sense that their meaning cannot be
> explicated sufficiently in
> terms of truth-conditions."
> (Ron: A kind of "not knowing")
> "Correspondingly, the epistemology of ethics divides
> into cognitivism
> and non-cognitivism; a distinction that
> is often perceived as equivalent to that between
> descriptivists and
> non-descriptivists. Non-cognitivism may
> be understood as the claim that ethical claims
> reach beyond the scope
> of human cognition or as the (weaker)
> claim that ethics is concerned with action rather
> than with knowledge."
> [Ron continues]
> SA, I took this to mean what you are stating, that
> value may be
> concerned with action rather than knowledge
> and "By applying dynamic quality and thus, clearing
> the intellectual
> level to new open-minded, creative
> thoughts is morally helpful." thereby your statement
> supports a
> non-cognitive view.
But it is cognitive and not cognitive. What does
this mean? Well, to clear the mind involving
"creative thoughts" is 'dynamic intellectualizing'.
Dynamic quality is differientated from static quality,
but dynamic quality, from SPOV, shows with a picture
and description how dynamic quality is immersed in
each of the levels and around the levels. Thus, a
dynamic intellect is creative thinking and/or
open-minded thinking or state of mind. Therefore it
is cognitive. It is also not just intellectual due to
each of the static levels involved. I would agree
that it is more action than knowledge. It is the act
of intellectualizing, not just regarjating something
that doesn't involve new ideas, in other words
relaying on knowledge that is already known to the one
using the knowledge. The latter is not wrong and is
helpful in organizational purposes. It is getting
stuck in the same stuff without the ability to
understand new 'stuff', the open-minded, creative
stuff.
[Ron]
> but, I suppose if you want to take me literally with
> the "seem to cover
> all the bases" you could probably
> find other aspects which are not mentioned, so you
> are correct, it does
> not cover all the bases, but it does provide a
pretty
> wide field for usefull
> purposes of comprehension.
Yes, but it is more knowledge based, and doesn't
involve my or yours present intellectualizing process
that is happening at this very moment.
SA
____________________________________________________________________________________
Check out the hottest 2008 models today at Yahoo! Autos.
http://autos.yahoo.com/new_cars.html
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
