Bo,

     This is not my post Bo.  This is another Heather.


SA




> Hi Spirit
> 
> On 4 Dec. you said:
> 
> >  [quote]
> > Do you think that a cat can think?
> 
> > "To think" carries tons of SOM. What you ask is
> really "are cats
> > self-aware"?  Cats are certainly INTELLIGENT but
> is neither part
> > of the social nor of the intellectual levels,
> particularly the latter
> > where the "self-awareness"  term - not belong -
> but was CREATED.
>  
> > My own observations:
> > Some cats can certainly "think".   Some people
> think.  It seems to
> > hinge on what the definition of "thinking" is in
> each persons personal
> > dictionary. Attempts to create Absolute
> definitions about "IQ" or
> > "thinking" create VERY slippery slopes for anyone
> with that much of
> > confidence about ALL cats or ALL people.
> 
> Sure, cats can think if you mean have what it takes
> to be a 
> "good" cat. Birds likewise, my favorite is a crow, I
> have told about 
> its ability to hoist up a food ball by the string by
> using its beak, 
> then steps on the string while it shifts the grip.
> This clearly 
> requires a lot of thinking and learning by
> experimenting. 
> 
> I also agree that it hinges on the definition and
> "thinking" must be 
> one of the words that has most entries in
> dictionaries. In my 
> Oxford Advanced what comes to what we mean is this: 
> 
>     "To use your mind to consider something, to form
> 
>     connected ideas, to try to solve problems ...
> etc.   
> 
> But there is also something about 
> 
>     "Having ideas, words or images in your mind". 
> 
> We see that everything is supposed to take place in
> a mind and 
> because "mind" has just as many definitions
> including that of 
> "consciousness", no wonder that SOM has had problems
> with 
> smart animals. The classic nineteenth century notion
> was that 
> they lived in some slumber-like state, but that's
> wrong, none are 
> more alert than animals.  
> 
> But MOQ has a totally different approach - ought to
> have at least 
> - but Pirsig's initial definition of the
> intellectual level as something 
> resembling "mind" created an insumountable  problem
> for MOQ's 
> breakthrough on the scene. Pirsig:   
> 
>     "For purposes of MOQ precision, let's say that
> the 
>     intellectual level is the same as mind. It is
> the collection 
>     and manipulation of symbols created in the
> brain, that 
>     stands for patterns of experience." (Lila's
> Child annotation 
>     25)  
> 
> This is simply a definition of language and not of
> the  
> intellectetual level: Let me start with the MOQ view
> of 
> "intelligence" and how this differs from the
> intellectual LEVEL  
> 
> Far down in the biological realm the neural
> complexity (not 
> necessarily neocortex brain) allowed "storage of
> experience" 
> (read-write memory) this could be manipulated in
> some "cache", 
> where the organism could visualize situations "if I
> do this, such a 
> thing will happen", all wordless and thoughtless,
> rather intuitively. 
> This capability increased in step with brain, but
> must not be 
> confused with INTELLECT which is the S/O ability, in
> this case to 
> distinguish between the imaginary and the real *)
> paraphrasing 
> Pirsig: "Intellect is the power of distinguishing
> between symbols 
> and what is symbolized. 
> 
> Intellect is solely and genuinely a human level **)
> while thinking 
> /intelligence is common with most animals. Below
> some 
> biological threshold there is just ROM (read only
> memory), yet 
> even an amoeba knows its ways around the amoeba
> world, i.e. it 
> recognises the biological values. That is not
> dependent on brain 
> or nerves or senses in the 5-senses sense.          
>  
> 
> *) Animals sleep and dream and in dreams one doesn't
> know the 
> imaginary from the real and there exist a blockage
> that cuts the 
> brain/body connection that hinders "us" from
> enacting dreams.      
>     
> **) I have skipped the social level. It is also a
> human endeavor. It 
> exploited biological intelligence for own purpose,
> but even at this 
> plane the S/O in the intellectual meaning weren't
> realized.  
> 
> IMO
> 
> Bo
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
>
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
> 


      
____________________________________________________________________________________
Looking for last minute shopping deals?  
Find them fast with Yahoo! Search.  
http://tools.search.yahoo.com/newsearch/category.php?category=shopping
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

Reply via email to