Hi Steve, I prefer to see it as ... A pattern, of patterns, of patterns, of .... of value. (which is ultimately just another "pattern" so I think I'd agree.)
Ian On 12/14/07, Steve Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Bo, > > You said to Spirit and Ian: > > I can't for the life of me figure > > out what a level is besides its value > > Steve: > It's becoming more and more clear to me that you really don't know > what a level is. I'd be happy to help if you think I could be of > assistance. > > The levels refer to types of static patterns of value. You seem to > always refer to a level as "the value of X" as in "the value of the S/ > O divide" or as in this case a level having a value. Nowhere does > Pirsig describe a level as a single value. He always uses them as > parts of a classification system for types of patterns. > > Pirsig: > "In this plain of understanding static patterns of value are divided > into > four systems: inorganic patterns, biological patterns, social > patterns and > intellectual patterns. They are exhaustive. That's all there are. > If you > construct an encyclopedia of four topics-Inorganic, Biological, > Social and > Intellectual-nothing is left out. No "thing," that is. Only Dynamic > Quality, which cannot be described in any encyclopedia, is absent." > > > Bo: > > Yet, the MOQ is no static level it just reveals > > the Quality context. > > No, the MOQ is not a level, it is a pattern of value. > > Regards, > Steve > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/ > Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
