At 04:48 PM 12/17/2007, you wrote: >I'm pressed for time at the moment but quickly, >The captain projected his cultural preconceptions on Lila, when he was >Questioning her she got upset with him and told him she was what he >perceived her to be, not who she really is, she says that is what most >men she has met do to her.
Greetings Ron, I understood Lila's soliloquy a little differently. I think of her as stating that to name/define something is to kill it. To make it static and kill off the dynamic aspects. And in this sense, it is exactly why I do not like Bo's idea of creating a MOQ level. To confine Quality, or DQ, to a level may make it static. It's also the reason I don't like Ham's use of the words 'primary' and 'purpose'. To my thinking Quality (DQ) is best left is indivisible, undefinable and unknowable, and for Bo's case, unconfined. Marsha Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
