Hey Ron,

I have and will continue to read Bo's posts with care.

Marsha



At 01:45 PM 12/17/2007, you wrote:
>Hey Marsha,
>I'm not looking to make anyone happy per say, but understanding one
>another is a start in the direction of a general MoQ understanding. As I
>said before, Bo has some good points to consider when developing ones
>personal philosophy in regard to MoQ. The questions of "can we conceive
>outside of our cultural
>Understandings?" and "when we think we are thinking trans-culturally, or
>are we Merely rearranging our prejudices?"  need to be viewed with the
>  Understanding of how culture and intellect are directly involved with
>forming personal experience.
>
>Bo is not offering to change culture with a 5th level, in fact he is not
>Proposing a fifth at all, he is proposing a cultural understanding of a
>Trans-cultural concept.
>MoQ 's levels clearly illustrate that social and intellectual are
>separate
>Levels thus making that system outside any particular society
>specifically.
>Thus "taking quality off the chess board".
>
>Now if all we experience and perceive is culturally derived, then how
>the
>Heck does one explain and accurately use this level system?
>Bo's interpretation is by large Pirsigs interpretation only
>Bo emphasizes this quality of understanding.
>This shift is very important.
>It in no way validates a particular belief but it highlights a general
>understanding when viewing these concepts from a particular perpective.
>
>The Skutvik paradigm shift is a viable and useful concept to keep
>In mind when interpreting the MoQ. And it's relation to SOM. Or
>Any cultural understanding it is viewed from.
>-Ron
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of MarshaV
>Sent: Monday, December 17, 2007 1:11 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: [MD] Knowledge as MOQ's intellect
>
>
>Greetings Ron,
>
>Does Bo think that by adding a 5th MOQ level he's going to change our
>culture?  Good luck!!!
>
>The English language is a very immediate link with my culture.  It is
>structured on a s/o point-of-view.  I must use it.  But in spite of
>that, I know full well that it doesn't reflect my experience.  There
>is definitely a mismatch happening, and it's become comfortable.
>
>I totally emphasize with Bo's frustration.  He's uncomfortable with
>the mismatch.  Yet I feel no compelling reason to adopt the SOL to
>make Bo feel comfortable.  Pirsig's point-of-view suits me just fine.
>To me the MOQ is a better world-view that more accurately describes
>reality.  I have never thought of the MOQ as 'just another
>theory'.  It is the best!!!   But if something comes along that looks
>better, I will consider it.
>
>Marsha
>
>
>
>At 12:09 PM 12/17/2007, you wrote:
> >Dan and Marsha,
> >If you would allow me to interrupt, I think I have an understanding on
> >what
> >Bo's SOL interpretation means.
> >Bo equates SOM with the intellectual level by virtue of culture. SOL is
> >MOQ
> >Interpreted through SOM culture.
> >
> >Both of you are also correct by positing as Pirsig does, that SOM is an
> >Intellectual pattern just as MOQ when one views the levels outside of
> >culture.
> >When viewed within the culture (as Bo maintains that's all one can ever
> >do)
> >SOM is the intellectual level and MOQ can only be used via it's
>cultural
> >distinctions. In this interpretation MoQ is realized through SOM
> >cultural understanding. Since we as individuals are defined by the
> >culture we
> >live in,
> >Our intellect is also defined by the culture we live in.
> >Ideally, Pirsig generated the levels as a general evolutionary trans
> >Cultural paradigm.
> >But as Bo accurately points out, we can only ever view this paradigm
> >through
> >Our own cultural understandings.
> >This is what makes his SOL interpretation a more accurate appraisal of
> >MoQ concepts as it relates to our specific cultural understanding.
> >Because we simply can not escape our own cultural influences
> >Our cultural influences make up who we are and how we view reality.
> >Try to speak outside of culture and it is meaningless, therefore
> >Immediate experience is the closest culturally understood descriptor
> >Of a trans cultural experience.
> >And as that experience it possesses more human commonality than
> >That of any intellectual cultural distinction.
> >
> >-Ron
> >
> >
> > >>> Dan,
> > >>>
> > >>> What do you think of making the Intellectual Level subject/object
> > >>> only, and creating a MOQ level above?
> > >>
> > >>Hi Marsha
> > >>It doesn't jibe with the way I understand the MOQ. Like the SOM, the
> > >>MOQ is a theory, an idea, a static quality intellectual pattern of
> > >>value. That seems pretty simple. I see no reason to posit any
> > >>further levels. It only complicates matters.
> > >
> > > That's the way I see it too. Maybe if Bo's problem can be better
> > > understood, a better way to address it will surface.
> >
> >Hi Marsha
> >I notice that I often become manic about certain ideas and worry them
> >like an old dog worries a bone but I tend to grow tired after a while
> >and like the old dog let go. I admire Bo's tenacity but have nothing
> >more to add that would serve to change his mind. He's been gnawing this
> >bone for nigh on 10 years now and I am still not sure who he hopes to
> >convince save himself or what difference said convincing will make. His
> >jaw has got to be tired though.
> >
> >Dan
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >Moq_Discuss mailing list
> >Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> >http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> >Archives:
> >http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> >http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
> >Moq_Discuss mailing list
> >Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> >http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> >Archives:
> >http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> >http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
>
>Moq_Discuss mailing list
>Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>Archives:
>http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
>Moq_Discuss mailing list
>Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>Archives:
>http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

Reply via email to