SA, Don't you think Pirsig's framework should be tested? Don't you see the platypus?
-Peter On 23/12/2007, Heather Perella <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > [Peter] > > SA seems to have been irritated like hearing someone > > shouting 'platypus' but he can't see it. > > Just to play devil's advocate and as a rival > > solution to Bo's: perhaps > > Pirsig's primary split of reality should have been > > into Dynamic Quality and > > SOM!! > > > Peter, I'm not the one dissatisfied with Pirsig's > moq. I find it perfectly understandable. Why you and > Bo have difficulty with Pirsig's moq, I don't know. > This is why I feel empathy for Bo and you. This is > why I try to help you two. But, you being the > "devil's advocate" in my experience is an event for > bored people who try to come up with a way to get > people talking about what they want to discuss. Hey, > go for it! But I'll stick with Pirsig's moq thank you > very much. > > > rain drops, > SA > > > > > ____________________________________________________________________________________ > Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page. > http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/ > Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
