Hi Steve, it's a while since I read ZAMM and I'm not going to start dipping back into that book again now; but the sequence of events you give is not how I remember it. But no matter; you still have not responded to Bo's question: you said that 'MoQ can resolve this problem' and Bo replied 'Tell us'. I tried to rephrase the problem for you and SA.
-Peter On 23/12/2007, Steve Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi Peter, > > > > > Pirsig's MoQ has the secondary split of static quality into mind > > and matter. > > A later split of Pirsig's was to divide mind into intellectual and > > social > > ideas. > > One of those intellectual ideas was the evil and mighty SOM. > > SOM is concerned with the split of reality into mind and matter. > > Contradiction: mind and matter is the result of Pirsig's beautiful > > secondary > > split in the MoQ. > > > > > I think what's missing here is the evolutionary relationship between > the static levels. The progression isn't to split DQ/SQ then Mind/ > matter then mind into social and intellectual. After DQ/SQ he splits > sq into an evolutionary hierarchy that starts with inorganic to > biological to social to intellectual. Then he looks back and sees > that mind/matter still fits pretty nicely in this scheme. > > > > No answer from Steve yet. > > Can you repeat the question. > > Regards, > Steve > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/ > Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
