Hi Peter, >> Bo earlier: >> > > One can't have a collection of two upper levels without it being a >> > > collection of all levels and all levels means intellect as top notch >> > > and thus an "intellectual" -- um -- culture. A SOM culture that (as >> > > Steve says) doesn't know anything about social patterns (nor that >> > > its own is intellectual I may add) Only from MOQ's meta-level the >> > > Q-context is seen. >> >> > Dan: >> > As you know, I don't subscribe to your theory that the MOQ is a >> > "meta-level." The MOQ is Robert Pirsig's idea and as such is a >> > collection of intellectual patterns of value > Peter: >I think 'meta-level' is appropriate because openness to the dynamic is like >seeing the whole context (the actual levels) by stepping beyond the limits >of the 4th level, the limitations of SOM. Besides MoQ is metaphysics!
I agree with Dan. I think of the levels as types of patterns of value. I think that is what RMP meant when he used the terms. I can't think of what meaning a meta-level of the MOQ would have while thinking of the levels as types of patterns of value. Regards, S$teve Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
