HI Ron:
>Steve: > >I suspect in your "meta-level" of the MOQ you may intend for it to be a >level of awareness above intellectual awareness, and I think there may >be something to that line of thought. But as a type of pattern of >value, to me it doesn't make sense to think of the MOQ as anything but >an intellectual pattern of value. > >Ron: >It is an intellectual pattern regarding individual experiential >awareness. an intellectual pattern aware of itself as an intellectual >pattern. Steve: Intellectual patterns are not aware of themselves. Self-awareness is an example of an intellectual pattern. Ron: Good point, what then would you suggest would be a proper distinctive term To differentiate self awareness, or just simply, leave it at that? Ron: >The want to differentiate this awareness from unawareness of this >Aspect is what Bo proposes. He proposes that this awareness guide >Intellectual patterns as just that, self aware intellectual patterns. Steve: I can't imagine what an example of a self-aware intelellectual pattern would be. Can you provide one? Ron: the key understanding is of self awareness socially as well as intellectually. But you are correct Steve. Question: where would one place the act of pre-intellectual awareness As arrived at via an intellectual pattern?. Does it still qualify as a concept Or is it a state of being? It could be argued that all concepts are states of being but are all states of being concepts? Thoughts? Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
