Ian and Steve >The levels need to make enough sense as distinct things, in order for >a description of the world in their terms to make sense. So we are >right to debate what each distinct level means.
>1/2 and 2/3 seem clear enough. The debate about the distinction >between levels 3 & 4 remains. SOMism and symbolic manipulation do not >seem to be limited to either (3) social or (4) intellectual levels >exclusively. (something like "authority" and "freedom of thought" seem >to be clearer distinguishing features - though socio-cultural factors >complicate what passes for free thinking rationale ... has always been >my argument against Bo.) >No idea if that helps ? >Ian It does help, just as you point out "symbolic manipulation do not seem to be limited to either (3) social or (4) intellectual levels exclusively" the reason I am inclined to like the SOL is because it seems a good tool to use, but please, elaborate on your idea about freedom and authority, it sounds interesting Steve: Just wanted to say that you have a valid point there. (in your post about creating reality) That's all I have had time to conclude for now, =) Regards Chris Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
