Heather
> Chris: >> This is not advocating the SOM, this is not >> going back to a preZMM >> understanding, it is just making the MOQ run more >> smoothly. > > SA: Bo doesn't know what the moq does (his meta-level > moq above his 4th level). I've asked him before. No > answer. Marsha recently asked him. No answer. So, > Bo goes on intellectualizing the world as s's and o's. > Rationalizing s's and o's, and thus, what's so > different from this kind of thinking of the world and > SOM, nothing. SOM is not just a reality, it's a > reality based on a kind of thinking. SOM is a way to > philosophy about how the world is, thus, in SOM the > world is about a subject separating him/her self from > objects. This is all fine and useful, but I don't > find this 'separation' to be the only way to > understand the world. What about a good poem where > we're not concentrating on trying to divide up the > world between us's and them's/pure black and pure > white/I and everything else. To plainly separate the > world this way is and to take this as the only way to > intellectualize is shallow and narrrow. What about > beautiful paintings? A poem.. Yes. Good point. I have often compared the MOQ to a poem, it's beauty anyway. So where does a poem belong in a MOQ universe? Yes, good question. I'd call upon Bo to answer this, And now I have to go to hear about 19th century Russia =) Regards Chris Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
