At 08:37 AM 2/12/2008, you wrote: >At 07:08 AM 2/12/2008, you wrote: > > >Bo, > > > > en snabb fråga: > > > >If anyone can point to some elaborate, abstract thoughts that did not serve > >the values of the social level or the biological and were clearly not a part > >of a S/O distinction(and was not the MOQ) - would that prove the SOL > >invalid? > > > >Regards > > > >Chris >
Re: Above question? Is it elaborate? Does it serve the social or biological levels? Does it represent subject-object distinction? Is it the MOQ? >********* >The universe is uncaused, like a net of jewels in >which each is only the reflection of all the >others in a fantastic interrelated harmony without end. > > > >Moq_Discuss mailing list >Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. >http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org >Archives: >http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ >http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/ ********* The universe is uncaused, like a net of jewels in which each is only the reflection of all the others in a fantastic interrelated harmony without end. Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
